Okay, I concede the point. I don't normally put on my hat that allows me to speak for God, but any church that turns away the "too" sinful is out of fellowship with Christ, and I could imagine that the marginalized in our society would identify with the "bouncer" imagery even in cases where it was a fringe minority of the congregation and not the clergy that was perpetuating the unwelcomeness.

Even if this was a close moral call (and it is not), a broadcast television station has no place in choosing to censor the message or a major religious denomination, any more than if they chose to block Chevrolet ads because the network's board of directors prefer Fords.

If there is good news, it is that the stink that this is raising will undoubtedly provide more exposure of the UCCs Open and Affirming principles than if the ads had been broadcast and been forgotten.

And thank you so much for putting my mind to rest in another matter. I had been searching for a few days now to see what ETA stood for in blog-ese. :)