Someone wrote in [personal profile] pegkerr 2003-10-08 03:45 pm (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand...

... why a Supreme Court justice changing his mind on whether it's any of the State's business if one homosexual inserts his penis into another willing homosexual has anything at all to do with whether or not two (or three or four or eighteen) people of various sexes should have their union, whatever it might be, be called "marriage" by the state, or how that would have affected Paul.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org