Aug. 21st, 2007

pegkerr: (Default)
John's punishment is to lick a cat:




Follow the Brotherhood 2.0 project by friending [livejournal.com profile] brotherhood2.
pegkerr: (What would Dumbledore do?)
This article, Harry Potter and "the Death of God" came up in my Harry Potter Google alert today. Okay, here's a clue: it is apparently from a right-wing Catholic website. The author is introduced as Michael O'Brien, "North America's foremost Potter critic" (who is apparently so notable that I've never even heard of him). Mr. O'Brien says:
In short, the series is a kind of anti-Gospel, a dramatized manifesto for behavior and belief embodied by loveable, at times admirable, fictional characters who live out the modern ethos of secular humanism to its maximum parameters.
I'd love to hear what John Granger ([livejournal.com profile] hogwartspro) has to say about this. I'll e-mail him tonight to see if he has any comment. Meanwhile, anyone else care to weigh in? [livejournal.com profile] aeditimi? Bueller? Anyone?

Edited to add: [livejournal.com profile] aeditimi has written a great response here. Thanks!
pegkerr: (Shakespeare)
Since [livejournal.com profile] penmage asked:

Here is how our playreading group has worked over the years.

We used to meet every two weeks. We'd start at about 7:00 p.m. and go until . . . whenever. Generally 10:00 or 11:00, sometimes longer. We tended to gravitate to one person who hosted most of the time, because they were willing, and because they had the best living room layout. Since we had a set time and date (first and third Fridays of the month) there wasn't a lot of organization necessary. People showed up at the agreed upon time and brought copies of the play. Sometimes the host would try to have two or three extra copies on the play on hand, if people didn't have their own. Many of us would resort to the library. Occasionally we would run into trouble when there were variant editions of the play (we ran into that problem with Arcadia last night, as a matter of fact) and if we knew that was the case, we might specify which edition to pick up.

Mostly, we'd have a number of people that fluctuated between about five to about twelve at the most. Generally, we picked plays that had enough characters that everyone would get at least one part, and sometimes two or three. We would sit around the living room in a rough circle, depending on the layout of chairs and couches.

Food (in our opinion) is essential to a pleasant playreading experience. The host would provide a variety: cakes, cookies, bread, cheese, hummus, fruit. Other people would bring other offerings: tomatoes from the garden, homemade tortes, sometimes a little wine. I always looked forward to [livejournal.com profile] pameladean's gingerbread (and if any of you start a playreading group and ask me, I will forward you the recipe). Edited to add: The gingerbread recipe is here. We would grab a plateful of food, fix ourselves a mug of coffee or tea, and then gravitate toward the living room. We would chat and visit for awhile, and gradually, we would decide to start reading. Usually, there was someone who had already read the play and could advise as to which parts were good to double (so that you didn't end up reading two different characters who would be in the same scene so that you would end up arguing with yourself). A person might say, "I'd like to read Iago tonight," if she really had a hankering for a part, but if no one has any particular preference, someone who knew the play well would dole parts out. Since we'd been reading together for years, we knew that if you read a major part tonight, next time you might have three minor parts, but it all eventually evened out in the end.

We would usually break at a halfway point (in a Shakespeare play often after Act III) for more food and visiting, which might last ten or fifteen minutes while people refilled their plates and coffee mugs.

A few people brought needlework, and that was okay, as long as they followed the play along so that there wasn't a long pause while they were counting their stitches and eventually realized that no one was speaking because they were waiting for a part to come in, "Oh! Is it my line? Oh, sorry! 'Come, bring forth the prisoners' . . . etc."

As for how to find people: well, ask around to see who's interested. It's a pretty good bet to include literary people who like books and drama. They certainly don't have to be trained actors! We all got good with practice, and some of us became quite excellent indeed.

At the end of the evening, we would discuss which play we would like to do next, ("Let's try Fry's The Lady's Not for Burning), but we wouldn't set parts until people showed up that night, and we actually saw who was present. If you are just getting started, I would suggest trying a comedy first, just to show people how much fun it can be. A Midsummer Night's Dream is a good place to start.

Playreading, as I have said, is surprisingly fun, and it's a great way to spend an evening with friends. If you start a group, let me know how it goes! Any questions, leave 'em in the comments.

Profile

pegkerr: (Default)
pegkerr

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  123 45
678910 1112
1314151617 1819
2021222324 2526
2728293031  

Peg Kerr, Author

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags