Austenmania and critical snobbery
Mar. 15th, 2005 12:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The Pride of Austen Critics: a Prejudice?
Deborah Kaplan muses upon the immense growth of popularity of Jane Austen's fiction, and the effect that all the recent adaptations of her work has had upon the assumption that her work is truly only accessible and enjoyed by those fortunate few with elevated taste:
Deborah Kaplan muses upon the immense growth of popularity of Jane Austen's fiction, and the effect that all the recent adaptations of her work has had upon the assumption that her work is truly only accessible and enjoyed by those fortunate few with elevated taste:
"...while many of us were trying, whether we were aware of it or not, to rescue Austen from her popularity, other critics were beginning to view the representations and activities that constitute Austenmania with more appreciation and, in the process, to probe our discipline's investment in hierarchies of literary value, readings, and readers. For the study of Austenmania prompts questions about what cultural works we value, why and how we value them, and who "we" are.Read the whole essay here.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-15 06:51 pm (UTC)Second, any studies of popular culture and Austen has to deal with Heyer and how the entire perception of the Regency, Regency culture, literature, romance, even, was wrenched out of focus by her intense and ongoing popularity. So few are aware of the roots of the Silver Fork novels that Heyer comes out of and how she doesn't actually engage with Austen's themes at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-15 10:39 pm (UTC)Interesting...
Date: 2005-03-15 11:18 pm (UTC)It seems to me that there was a great deal of feminist interest in Austen. Anyone else feel that way?
Also, I'm picking up a great deal of -uh- "well spoken bitchiness" in _Vanity_Fair_, and it seems to me that Austen's book have the same style. But like I said, I'm whistleing in the dark here...