Universal Health Care
Sep. 22nd, 2005 02:04 pmStarbucks spent more last year on health care for its employees than it did for the raw materials to brew coffee.
This is just insane. We need universal health care.
This is just insane. We need universal health care.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-22 07:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-22 07:32 pm (UTC)But we need a carefully developed plan that is NOT designed by politicians without medical input (or we'll be lucky to get something even approaching the level of medicaid), and that is neither designed nor implemented by the National Institute of Health (who don't know how to manage their money for beans).
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-22 09:36 pm (UTC)It was a basic mistake to tie health care to employment in the first place -- but it was done as a way to get around wage controls, and still compete for the best employees. Which never got backed away from.
I'm not sure I want to make health care a government monopoly; that makes every medical decision a political decision.
I'm a lot clearer on what I *don't* like than what I *do* like here, though.
The first step I know I want to see (this won't "solve" the "whole problem") is to get rid of the cherry-picking in insurance rating. I'd do this by one simple insurance regulation -- that any policy you offer to somebody in your service area, you offer to *anybody* in your service area. So they can compete, employers can negotiate for deals they like -- and everybody can get insurance at those rates. (I think I'd also require that their service area be drawn along existing county boundaries, to avoid most opportunities to red-line poor neighborhoods.) Insurance is about pooling risk. Health insurance has especially high risks in the worst cases, and needs the biggest pools for it to make sense. This simply keeps insurance companies on that track.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-22 11:21 pm (UTC)