pegkerr: (Default)
[personal profile] pegkerr
Before today, I would have asked, "Who?"

What do you think?

I think McCain is nuts. But then, I thought that anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidschroth.livejournal.com
Nice line at the end there...

He chose a trophy running mate, not a partner.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 12:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
Yeah. I hope it gets used.

B

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 06:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
I hope it doesn't. Take her down for any of the huge list of reasons she's not a good candidate, but not because she's a woman.

K.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidschroth.livejournal.com
My perspective is different - I see the last line as denigrating the person who made the choice, not the person chosen.

No doubt my perspective is askew from that of normal folk...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 12:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
Remember: "Obama - Biden '08. Only two houses. Only two spouses."

B

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joel-rosenberg.livejournal.com
Rocks. Anybody who thinks Obama might possibly be qualified to be President will beclown himself -- or herself -- by mocking Sarah Palin's qualifications for VP.

I hadn't thought McCain would make such a good choice.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shweta-narayan.livejournal.com
Seems like a silly argument to me. Obama as less experience than McCain, but most of McCain's experience consists of making really stupid decisions. Looking at the voting record recently, McCain just looks bad.

Biden has experience comparable to McCain's and has made better decisions overall.

Palin has less experience than Obama and does not seem to be able to make smart decisions. Firing someone for not firing your sister's ex does not seem smart to me.

So Obama/Biden win over McCain/Palin on both joint experience and joint judgment.

Obama has said he wants someone who will disagree with him, who he can debate with and listen to. Do we think McCain will listen to Palin?

The only motivation I see is that McCain thinks most Hillary supporters see one woman as equivalent to another. It's the McCain/Vagina ticket.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pegkerr.livejournal.com
It's the McCain/Vagina ticket.

*falls over laughing*

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:08 pm (UTC)
naomikritzer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naomikritzer
Huh. I'd have thought the advantage would run rather dramatically the other way. The Republicans have now cut off one of their lines of attack, since if Obama isn't qualified to get that 3 a.m. phone call, Sarah Palin sure as heck is not qualified to get the 3:05 one. (The one that goes, "President McCain just had a massive stroke...")

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-31 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joel-rosenberg.livejournal.com
I think the argument that experience is only important in the VP choice, but not in the POTUS choice, will only appeal to the True Believers.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:13 pm (UTC)
naomikritzer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naomikritzer
Incidentally, I don't have a particular problem with her level of experience. I think most of the liberals talking about her experience are mostly just gobsmacked that after making a huge enormous deal about Obama's lack thereof, the Republicans would pick Palin.

EXPERIENCE COUNTS! EXPERIENCE MATTERS! WHO DO YOU WANT GETTING THE 3 AM PHONE CALL? Oh, hey, meet your future vice president! She used to be a mayor of a town with less than 6,000 people, and then she became Governor of Alaska, a position she's held for almost two years now!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:17 pm (UTC)
naomikritzer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naomikritzer
Oh, wait. The population was under 6,000 in the 2000 census. Wasilla now claims a population of 6,715.

It's a really tiny town.

Actually, being mayor of a really small town is probably pretty good preparation for going to Washington. You'll certainly have a good idea of how one works with Congress...

Palin, Obama, and Inexperience

Date: 2008-08-31 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
I don't understand why this is a benefit. Politics aside, I don't understand the tactic.

It's not that Obama supporters argue that he is qualified; it's not a Demoratic talking point. "Not qualified" is a Republican talking point; they're the ones pushing argument. And it was a promising argument. But Palin is even less experienced than Obama. And McCain chose her. It's a contradiction in the Republican message, not in the Democrats'.

"'I think we're going to have to examine our tag line, "dangerously inexperienced,"' a top McCain official said wryly.".

Or Rove on "Face the Nation" (video at the link):

Well, with all due respect again to Gov. Kaine, he's been a governor for three years. He's been able but undistinguished; I don't think people could really name a big, important thing that he's done. He was mayor of the 105th largest city in America. Again, with all due respect to Richmond, Virginia, it's smaller than Chula Vista, California, Aurora, Colorado, Mesa or Gilbert, Arizona, North Las Vegas or Henderson, Nevada. It's not a big town. So if you were going to pick Governor Kaine, it would be an intensely political choice where he said, you know what, I'm really not first and foremost concerned with is this person capable of being President of the United States, what I'm concerned about is can he bring me the electoral votes of the state of Virginia, the thirteen electoral votes of Virginia.


Ouch. McCain's lucky that the he/she difference makes that quote unusable without a overabundance of backstory.

If McCain wanted to ensure that anyone accusing the vice presidential pick of not having enough experience, it would have been smarter to choose someone with experience. That would leave the inexperience argument around for McCain to use for another couple of months.

Again, politics aside, this seems like a needless jettosning of a good attack on Obama. And it also brings up the age issue -- as any inexperienced VP pick would -- which seems like a mistake as well. And the news gets to run the clip of McCain saying that his most important criteria is that the person is ready to assume the role of the presidency (sorry, I couldn't find the clip quickly, and didn't have time to search), which plays into the Democratic "reckless" frame. I get the political positives of her pick, but wasn't there someone with the same politics and more garvitas?

B

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-31 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
I didn't help that he spent her acceptance speech checking out her butt.

B

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-31 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pegkerr.livejournal.com
Oh, my, is that wince-worthy. I couldn't bring myself to watch the whole thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-01 04:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
It's easier with the sound off.

B

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-01 04:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
Never mind. I've been reading some smart analyses that talk about how the "inexperience" attack isn't working, and the Republicans are dropping it in favor of other lines of attack. I'm understanding their reasoning a bit better.

B

(no subject)

Date: 2008-09-01 02:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pegkerr.livejournal.com
Could you point me to some of the analysis you are talking about?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:20 pm (UTC)
ext_13979: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ajodasso.livejournal.com
Guilty as charged.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thistlerose.livejournal.com
This undercuts his argument that Obama's too inexperienced to be president. If he really thinks he's going to get the women's vote this way, well, it just shows you how little he thinks of women.

I'm glad it's not Pawlenty.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joel-rosenberg.livejournal.com
Yup; I agree: Obama's too inexperienced to be president. And the folks who are objecting to Palin as VP are -- unwittingly -- agreeing with you and me.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thistlerose.livejournal.com
Please don't put words in my mouth. I never said Palin was too inexperienced, only that, in tapping her, McCain has undercut one of his own arguments about Obama.

It takes more than "experience" to make a good president.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joel-rosenberg.livejournal.com
And more than sweethart real estate deals with a convicted Rezo. Err: felon.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-31 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] minnehaha.livejournal.com
Right; what the person said below. The "inexperience" frame is a Republican one, not a Democratic one. The cognitive dissonance is on the Republican side, and seems like a needless giveaway.

B

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eal.livejournal.com
What "lj user='thistlerose'> said.

I'm just too stunned for words beyond that right now.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] avengangle.livejournal.com
Dear John McCain,

If you possibly think that I feel that Sarah Palin is a good substitute for Hillary Clinton for one minute, then you have the intelligence of a dung beetle.

Since you obviously think that, well . . .

Sincerely,

Someone with Two X Chromosomes

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mamculuna.livejournal.com
I think this was maybe a smart move--or not. Women who would have voted for Hillary aren't going to vote for some pro-life, pro-gun rightwinger.

I hope. Maybe we're all nuts.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:14 pm (UTC)
naomikritzer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naomikritzer
Well, she certainly appeals to Joel Rosenberg, but I would've figured McCain already had that vote locked up. ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pegkerr.livejournal.com
*snerk* Indeed.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:26 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ravenspb.livejournal.com
Agreed. Among other things, he finds the fact that she's "a hot babe" to be one of her defining points as a candidate.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:23 pm (UTC)
naomikritzer: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naomikritzer
Incidentally, I've thought for weeks that Palin should be more of a contender than she seemed to be. McCain needed a running mate that would appeal in some way to the swing voters while also shoring up his support with the Evangelicals. Palin is extremely popular with the Evangelicals but is also young, moderate-ish on gay issues, etc. She's also insanely popular in Alaska, which implies a high degree of charisma.

She'd gotten so little buzz, I'd figured there must be some deal-breaker I didn't know about (a bad TV voice? a skeleton in her closet?). But apparently not.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 11:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] von-krag.livejournal.com
Talked to some people I do research w/in AK, they do like her across all the political spectrum from Libs to Righties.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:24 pm (UTC)
pameladean: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pameladean
I can't wait to see if the idiot media will be as sexist about her as they were about Hillary Clinton.

I suspect they will, but in a very different way. I wonder if I can stand to watch it.

P.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamcoat-mom.livejournal.com
The choice of running mate was weird enough, but as I told a friend over on my journal today, McCain's cloak and dagger crap during the speech, along with announcing his scene-stealing VP pick the day afterward was a bit like a drunken uncle taking the mic out of the bride's hand during the wedding toasts to sing Feelings. I get the impression that the American public is a little fed up with such games. Poor John. The rules have changed, and he's just a little slow on the uptake.


(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 10:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barondave.livejournal.com
As I've said in other lj's, this is the best pick for Hillary. Clinton doesn't have to be "historic" anymore, and can run on her merits, which are considerable. She will still be in the limelight, far more than Biden, in comparison to Palin, and she will shine. In any debate, whether direct or conducted via back and forth speechifying, Hillary will mop the floor with her.

This is a Jack Kemp pick, and completely good news for Obama and the Democrats. McCain is solidifying his base of the 27% of ultra-right wingers who think Bush is too far to the left.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-29 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cph9680.livejournal.com
Well, he took care of the 10% of the time he disagreed with the Bush.

Between the two of them there's 100% support for the crimes of the past 8 years

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skg.livejournal.com
Am I the only one who is completely boggled by the fact that she has a four-month old baby and is not only acting governor of Alaska but now VP-nominee for the Republican party?

0_o


Yes to all the comments about it being a bizarre choice as well as a probably misstep.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 02:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] archmage45.livejournal.com
She isn't the acting governor of Alaska. She *is* the governor of Alaska.

But still a surprise choice.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 03:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thistlerose.livejournal.com
I assume her husband does his share of the parenting, so, no, not boggled. That's probably the only thing about her that I like. O_o

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 03:40 am (UTC)
ext_68560: (Default)
From: [identity profile] davidwilford.livejournal.com
Like about him, don't you mean?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thistlerose.livejournal.com
Her husband? Well, both of them, I suppose. Though, on second thought, I don't know enough about them to make that call. I just like the idea of parenting being shared.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 04:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moondancerdrake.livejournal.com
Or that the woman has cash and can pay for a nanny?

on second thought...

Date: 2008-08-30 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thistlerose.livejournal.com
I should say, I'm not boggled that she can balance a career and motherhood. I guess McCain thinks the ultra conservatives will look past that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-08-30 04:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moondancerdrake.livejournal.com
To me it's like him say "Look my VP has boobs so that means I support women right? Where's my feminist ally cookie?"

SMACK!

Profile

pegkerr: (Default)
pegkerr

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2345 67
89101112 1314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Peg Kerr, Author

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags