You've probably heard about this on your friends page already, but if you haven't, you should. The proposed bill would require Virginia women who suffer a miscarriage to report it within twelve hours to the police, and answer a bunch of impertinent questions, or risk going to jail. Class 1 misdemeanor, same as arson, statutory rape, stalking and providing alcohol to minors. Regardless of gestational age, mind you. I have a hard time believing this pinhead idea would actually pass, but then Virginia is the state which just passed a law which basically makes it illegal for gay partners to attempt to create documents and contracts to protect their partnership, and in fact interferes with gay couples doing estate planning, planning for medical emergency and holding joint real estate.
Every time I think that the Right has reached the limit of what they're capable of doing to people and that it can't possibly get any worse, by golly, they surprise me.
I gotta think this can't possibly pass. But a lot of laws have hit the books in the last year that I thought couldn't have possibly passed. The fact alone it's even being considered is appalling.
Gacked from
matociquala,
rolanni and probably a bunch of others.
Every time I think that the Right has reached the limit of what they're capable of doing to people and that it can't possibly get any worse, by golly, they surprise me.
I gotta think this can't possibly pass. But a lot of laws have hit the books in the last year that I thought couldn't have possibly passed. The fact alone it's even being considered is appalling.
Gacked from
I read this wrong...
Date: 2005-01-08 04:02 am (UTC)Took a look at the comments on matociquala's* site, noticed both the references to _Handmaid's_ _Tale_ (gotta tell my sister about that), and
comments about how common it is to miscarry. One of the big secrets in my family was that my mother had at least two miscarriages.
(* gads, I wish I knew how to make those linky things. Anybody want to explain it to me?)
Re: I read this wrong...
Date: 2005-01-08 04:25 am (UTC)Look here for more details, but to name a specific person, just say < lj user="exampleusername">, only without the space, and with the specific person's name there.
I dunno if you know HTML, but linking so you can say stuff about what the person says is also kind of fun. F'r example, < A HREF="http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=75> This here thing says...
(And so on.)
Re: I read this wrong...
Date: 2005-01-08 04:26 am (UTC)Sheesh.
Re: I read this wrong...
Date: 2005-01-08 05:27 am (UTC)Hey, it's Virginia we're talking about. It wouldn't shock me if that had been the title. Nothing seems too sinister for Virginians.
Just took a look at the proposed law
Date: 2005-01-08 04:15 am (UTC)D. When a fetal death occurs without medical attendance upon the mother _woman_*at or after the delivery or abortion or when inquiry or investigation by a medical examiner is required, the medical examiner shall investigate the cause of fetal death and shall complete and sign the medical certification portion of the fetal death report within twenty-four 24 hours after being notified of a fetal death.
Why the change from "mother" to "woman"?? I mean there might be a legitimate reason, but I can't think of one.
(*italicized in the original)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 04:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 05:00 am (UTC)It's one guy
Date: 2005-01-08 05:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 07:03 am (UTC)Also, if a woman's period is more than x number of weeks late, does that count? At eight weeks, especially if her periods are irregular, a woman might not even know she's pregnant. And can she prove she didn't even have sex during that time? Having just completed perimenopause, I know a lot about periods being late! I went eight months between periods once, and there was *no* chance of pregnancy there, believe me.
The Daily Kos has the text of the bill here. It includes this list of questions the woman is supposed to answer (and remember, this is within 12 hours of the miscarriage):
Even if this very stupid bill does pass, which seems unlikely to me, I think the courts will be quick to invalidate it!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 03:05 pm (UTC)But this is Virginia we're talking about, home of the eugenics movement, first in the country to enact and enforce involuntary sterilization laws, and where the Nazis studied to get ideas for their own Reich.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 04:38 pm (UTC)Suuuuure they did. As if they don't have enough to do already.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 06:11 pm (UTC)Oy. The stupidity.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-08 06:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-09 07:37 pm (UTC)Be nice if he'd /written the bill that way/.
Situation still has to be monitored.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-09 03:24 am (UTC)Though I'm sure there are some people in Virginia who would be happy to criminalize all those women out there having secret miscarriages. After all, it's a denial of our primary role in life, right?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-09 04:29 am (UTC)I posted this in my own blog awhile back...but it is parallel to the proposed bill
Date: 2005-01-09 12:00 pm (UTC)