Thinking about identity: "Being" a Writer
Jul. 6th, 2005 08:35 pmThis post has several roots. First, I have been feeling definite unease over the fact that, let's be honest, I just have not been working on the ice palace book. For months. I was pecking at it, and then my computer crashed last winter, and there was Christmas, and then taxes (which are STILL not done; don't blame me, blame Rob) and the end of school and karate and oh, all sorts of things. I let one thing after another crowd into my life and squeeze out the fiction writing.
I have talked in this journal about my fear that I have no more books in me, that I will never write fiction again. I wondered, for a number of years, whether I could still consider myself to be a writer.
This came up recently because I had this exchange of comments with
epicyclical. Cassie was asking whether her readers knew what they wanted to be when they grew up, so to speak. I said that I didn't know, which at age 45, I found most depressing. Cassie answered "But you are a writer -- just what everyone seems to want to be!"
And I let that comment sit for days while I thought about it. I couldn't bring myself to even reply to it, because something inside of me felt the honest thing to say was to protest, "You don't understand. I don't think I'm a writer anymore." And I didn't want to say that because a) everyone would think I was fishing for ego-boo and b) everyone would think I was crazy.
I might have just let things sit without ever answering Cassie, but then I posted the request that lurkers introduce themselves. And I got many lovely, lovely responses, but I was struck by how many said, in effect, it's so cool to read the journal of a real working writer. And once again I'm haunted by the feeling that I'm giving people a false impression.
Folks, whatever you think a working writer is, I'm worried that I ain't it. I have not made a dime selling fiction for several years now. I have not worked on the book for months. And yes, I find it difficult to admit this, because I wanted to be working on the book (but not enough to actually do the work, apparently) and I wanted to be considered "a real writer."
Or do I? And what does that mean to me?
I have thought a lot about this in the past week. And I have come to several tentative conclusions, and I realize that still I have several outstanding questions.
I realized that I was operating on the understanding that if I wasn't working on fiction, right now, continuously (and selling it), this somehow negated my past success. It "undid" my status as a writer. I had to ask myself, did this make sense? Do I cease to consider Harper Lee a writer because she wrote "just" one book (To Kill a Mockingbird), a masterpiece at that? What about Walter M. Miller, Jr., who only had A Canticle for Lebowitz published during his lifetime? Do I not consider them to be writers anymore? What is the sell-by date by which a writer's "writerlyness" expires? A year? Two years? Five years? A decade?
No, I realized. I still think of Harper Lee and Walter M. Miller, Jr. as writers, and I always will. I have had two books published. By the same reasoning, then, I have the same right to consider myself a writer, too.
But what about the fact that I'm not writing?
Well, duh, you point out. You're writing now, Peg. You write faithfully in your LiveJournal, and your words are read eagerly by more than a person or two: the lurkers who spoke up proved that.
And that's true, too. All right, so, I'm a writer. And I'm writing now, in the journal/essay format. Journaling was the first type of writing I ever did, probably, and it has been the most consistent type of writing I have done across my lifetime.
Apparently, the problem boils down to the fact that I'm not presently a writer of fiction right now.
So how do I feel about that?
Frankly, I really don't know. I am not entirely sure why I have stopped, and whether it is permanent. Is it due to depression? Is it lack of willpower? Some character flaw? Is this just the season of life that I am in, that I am a very conscientious parent in an intense period of motherhood? Sandra Day O'Connor, for heaven sakes, took five years off her career to raise her children. Why can't I do the same?
The difficult thing for me to admit is that I am not entirely sure that I want to write fiction any more. Why else am I not writing it? And yet, how hard it is to admit this, when so many perfectly nice people read my journal "to learn what it's like to be a real writer." Will you chide me for false pretenses? Will you denounce me as an imposter?
Will you demand that I give the necklace back?
To sum up: All right, I am a writer. But I am not sure whether I am a working fiction writer. I am not sure I want to be a working fiction writer anymore.
But if not . . . then what the hell is it that I want to be???
This has been a painful and scary entry to write. I have gone back and forth over whether or not I should enable comments. I want to state as clearly as I can that I am not leaving them on because I am begging for reassurances. I am 45 years old and I know that for my own mental health, I have to base my idea of myself on what I think of myself, rather than what other people think about me. But after long thought, I decided that if my intent was to speak truth in this entry, then it made sense to give people a chance to respond.
More to follow later, but I have to get the girls to bed now.
I have talked in this journal about my fear that I have no more books in me, that I will never write fiction again. I wondered, for a number of years, whether I could still consider myself to be a writer.
This came up recently because I had this exchange of comments with
And I let that comment sit for days while I thought about it. I couldn't bring myself to even reply to it, because something inside of me felt the honest thing to say was to protest, "You don't understand. I don't think I'm a writer anymore." And I didn't want to say that because a) everyone would think I was fishing for ego-boo and b) everyone would think I was crazy.
I might have just let things sit without ever answering Cassie, but then I posted the request that lurkers introduce themselves. And I got many lovely, lovely responses, but I was struck by how many said, in effect, it's so cool to read the journal of a real working writer. And once again I'm haunted by the feeling that I'm giving people a false impression.
Folks, whatever you think a working writer is, I'm worried that I ain't it. I have not made a dime selling fiction for several years now. I have not worked on the book for months. And yes, I find it difficult to admit this, because I wanted to be working on the book (but not enough to actually do the work, apparently) and I wanted to be considered "a real writer."
Or do I? And what does that mean to me?
I have thought a lot about this in the past week. And I have come to several tentative conclusions, and I realize that still I have several outstanding questions.
I realized that I was operating on the understanding that if I wasn't working on fiction, right now, continuously (and selling it), this somehow negated my past success. It "undid" my status as a writer. I had to ask myself, did this make sense? Do I cease to consider Harper Lee a writer because she wrote "just" one book (To Kill a Mockingbird), a masterpiece at that? What about Walter M. Miller, Jr., who only had A Canticle for Lebowitz published during his lifetime? Do I not consider them to be writers anymore? What is the sell-by date by which a writer's "writerlyness" expires? A year? Two years? Five years? A decade?
No, I realized. I still think of Harper Lee and Walter M. Miller, Jr. as writers, and I always will. I have had two books published. By the same reasoning, then, I have the same right to consider myself a writer, too.
But what about the fact that I'm not writing?
Well, duh, you point out. You're writing now, Peg. You write faithfully in your LiveJournal, and your words are read eagerly by more than a person or two: the lurkers who spoke up proved that.
And that's true, too. All right, so, I'm a writer. And I'm writing now, in the journal/essay format. Journaling was the first type of writing I ever did, probably, and it has been the most consistent type of writing I have done across my lifetime.
Apparently, the problem boils down to the fact that I'm not presently a writer of fiction right now.
So how do I feel about that?
Frankly, I really don't know. I am not entirely sure why I have stopped, and whether it is permanent. Is it due to depression? Is it lack of willpower? Some character flaw? Is this just the season of life that I am in, that I am a very conscientious parent in an intense period of motherhood? Sandra Day O'Connor, for heaven sakes, took five years off her career to raise her children. Why can't I do the same?
The difficult thing for me to admit is that I am not entirely sure that I want to write fiction any more. Why else am I not writing it? And yet, how hard it is to admit this, when so many perfectly nice people read my journal "to learn what it's like to be a real writer." Will you chide me for false pretenses? Will you denounce me as an imposter?
Will you demand that I give the necklace back?
To sum up: All right, I am a writer. But I am not sure whether I am a working fiction writer. I am not sure I want to be a working fiction writer anymore.
But if not . . . then what the hell is it that I want to be???
This has been a painful and scary entry to write. I have gone back and forth over whether or not I should enable comments. I want to state as clearly as I can that I am not leaving them on because I am begging for reassurances. I am 45 years old and I know that for my own mental health, I have to base my idea of myself on what I think of myself, rather than what other people think about me. But after long thought, I decided that if my intent was to speak truth in this entry, then it made sense to give people a chance to respond.
More to follow later, but I have to get the girls to bed now.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:46 am (UTC)I too am working my way through a "What if I'm not an X anymore?" crisis, and so I will give my best wishes that you find clarity and peace no matter how it resolves itself for you.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:54 am (UTC)On the other hand it would be hard for me to think of you as not a writer or even not a current one. It's similar to your mention of Harper Lee. I have The Wild Swans sitting in my to-be-read pile; it was bought only recently and I'm saving it as a treat on a long flight I have coming up. (I came to this journal knowing you not via your book but via your friendslist.) In your case, you've written a book people love, and that means you're always a writer. The book outlasts the currents of your life.
Er, not that that means it wouldn't make a lot of people very happy (probably including me, as of the end of this month, based on what I've heard about your work) for you to turn out another one. I don't want to get lynched here.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:57 am (UTC)To digress...
Date: 2005-07-07 07:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:01 am (UTC)None of us are 'just' a writer--we're so many things. But as you so very rightly point out, some are busy turning out that fiction, others are busy with life observations and discussions in blogs, and some are living life, having written. Writer is part of who they are, but not all of who they are.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:04 am (UTC)And even though that was what first brought me to your journal, I've come to love reading about you and your husband and daughters and karate class and all the rest of it. And even if you stand up and forsake fiction from this day forth, I'm not going to unfriend you because I still want to hear what you have to say.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:05 am (UTC)Much love,
Carol
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 07:17 pm (UTC)Agreed. I came because
A friend told me once that if she had to choose, she'd take being Harper Lee over being a steadily writing mid-list worker bee...but she loved writing and hoped she could mesh both (the hit and the steady work.)
I have been dry a long time...or rather, the condition keeps the two halves of my writer brain from easily talking. The Brain Underground is trying to get them together, but it's taking time.
But I've written five published novels, one unpublished novel, and 200,000 words of a new series, plus several good nonfiction articles and short stories--all of which I can be proud. Ergo, I am a writer. I hope to write again. I still hope for success and wealth in this lifetime (although I'll settle for good published books, and a big lotto win).
I'm just currently trying to keep up with life crises and Live Journal until the fiction writer muse comes back from vacation.
Do you still wish to write? I understand that WS took years to pull out of yourself, like threads from a tapestry jacket, artistically left hanging out to catch the light. Perhaps the next story is weaving itself together deep inside, as I trust stories are doing for me--and you need to wait until the right moment for them to peep out again?
I have been not reading the Friends page faithfully lately, for reasons I'll get around to explaining in my journal--so things may have changed. But between illness and karate and other things, it sounds like raising your daughters well is a full-time challenge, much less your own happiness and your spouse's.
Perhaps the Muse is waiting for you to take a deep breath, and be ready for her to say "How about this?"
I will point out that I am stalled on that 200,000 words--apparently, my muse wants to do something else for a while. Perhaps for you as well?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:17 am (UTC)What comes next? Heck if I know. But I do hope you have a lot of fun finding out.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:19 am (UTC)Of course you are a writer. No one can take that from you, not even yourself. If you weren't, you wouldn't still be struggling with it.
I really do hope you finish the Ice Palace book eventually, because I want to read it. I know that's somewhat selfish, to want you to write so I can read it. That's the kid part of me that wants to find out what happens next. But it also sounds to me like you still have that book in you, waiting to come out. The time has not been right. Your life has been very difficult the last several months. So the book is still incubating. Just like seeds that can't sprout until certain conditions are met, that book is still waiting for something to happen to make the ground fertile again.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 10:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:34 am (UTC)Meanwhile, without wishing to contradict anything anyone else has written thus far (because what I've seen above is all true in one sense or another), I have been reading the glare reports and wondering two things. The first is whether the issue is that this is not the book you wish to be writing right now, but that having gone this far, you feel obligated to continue. (If you've got a contractual commitment, it's not one that I'm aware of, so I haven't factored that in.) The second is whether it's simply that because this is a story about ice, its natural momentum is at a glacial pace. Or perhaps whether it's a story that you can only write in the cold.
I have been reading the things you've been sharing about the progress of the Ice Palace book with interest because it's something that I've experienced -- I'm a writer of essays and vignettes partly because the inspiration I have for fiction has never yet been lush enough to fuel a story of any sellable length -- and yet here you are, someone who is dealing with this now after having written something of enduring quality. I cannot pretend I'm not among those who have a wishing for the IP story to be told, but I know that this is a selfish wish because I've been reading your journal and seeing the fuller picture that you share. I would hardly wish for this story to be told at the expense of the things giving your life richness now.
I hope that you find peace with whatever path you take at this fork.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:38 am (UTC)I don't know what I'm going to end up being, it changes every couple of months. Because I find new areas, new interests. I had the passion for writing at one time...the passion is gone, the love of the craft is still there, and the writing itself has changed. I would say that your writting has returned to your roots in this journal. From the frequency of your posts and your dedication to writing everything down, you love the act of writing in this journal. So, yes, you are still a writer.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:40 am (UTC)Last summer, I was working at my uni and taking summer classes, and my buddy
We finally decided, about midway thru the summer semester, that being a writer isn't just putting words down on paper, because anyone can take a piece of paper, or a keyboard, and put words down. It's the thought that goes into it, the savoring of a situation to put down into words later, the remembering of a particularly delicious combination of words, the attempt to tease apart an event to see all the angles, and stitching it up later into something new. That's why I refer to myself as a writer. I think there are whole books in my head that I don't know are there yet. I discover them sort of haphazardly and I know sooner or later I'll find one ready to come out, and in the meantime I write shortfic and I blog and I savor and I remember.
I think you *are* a working writer, because you have that ability to process the world around you and express both the process, and the product, with words so beautifully chosen that sometimes all I can do is sit, suffering in wordless envy. Right now, that's what your writing is about: the process, the struggle to get through to the product. Now that I think about it, I admire you even more because of your openness.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:44 am (UTC)(Oddly, for no reason I can explain, I'm quite able to think of myself as a writer in a minor kind of way, even though I've rarely completed and never sold anything. But that's writing as a little piece of who I am, not writing as a vocation; I do understand that it would be different.)
But no, that's not the main reason I'm really moved by the entry. And it's not about anything to do with you as a writer or anything else. Maybe I shouldn't admit this, in this company, but I haven't read The Wild Swans. I think it's cool that you wrote a book. I think any number of things that you do are cool. They're not what I really care about. They're not what I'm grateful for.
It's just that you're doing such fabulous wrestling with yourself and your conception of yourself and your conception of identity and what you want and why you want it and who you are and what you do and who you want to be and what you want to do, the pain it causes you to think some things and how you manage to make it possible for yourself to think them anyhow. For those of us who have had a taste of it, vocation matters, I think. Writer, sailor, police, priest, it doesn't matter--if you've had work to do that was at one and the same time work and identity, the idea of losing that, of accepting a role of work which is not a vocation, not an identity, is full of terror and misery. But here you are with your best-you-can-do-at-any-given-moment honesty, your courage and your self-awareness, your desire to go further and understand more--
I'm always just so grateful when people are willing to do that thinking out loud. Of all the things in the world, I think that may be one of the things I value most dearly - the chance to be present while people work out their own answers to the most important questions in the world.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:46 am (UTC)What if I don't actually want to do this any more? That is the abyss I keep looking into.
I have many, many people on my friendslist because I enjoy hearing how their thoughts tick. Most of them aren't writers of fiction. You're still interesting even if you choose not to be Peg-Kerr-The-Writer.
Are you asking the right question?
Date: 2005-07-07 02:49 am (UTC)Why are you so certain that it's about becoming, and not about already being? What if you're already who and what you should be, and you can stop worrying about that, and start focusing on what you want to do with who you are? Your "are" is already pretty well rounded and developed; why gild the lily? What is making you feel unfinished or incomplete?
~Amanda
you keep that necklace!
Date: 2005-07-07 02:53 am (UTC)I have two half-finished fiddles sitting in a bin in storage who look at me from time to time and nod, saying "You'll have a woodshop again some day." I just don't know when.
We're all so many things - right now I'm being intensely an editor for dissertations and ESL highschoolers doing SAT prep classes during their summer, studying art marketing and having precious little time to make stuff while I get a grip on the newer editing client time, and working art sales at our local Renaissance Faires with a friend who carves amber, Reva Myers. Um, she does the Minnesota 'Fest so you may have seen her stuff. anyroad:
I've also been intensely a step-parent, a Goddess-mom to another young-un, who we just kept for five weeks and helped move into a new place after a rooming situation went south, but am not now currently doing much in the way of "parenting" to yon 25-year-olds, as I was 13 years ago. I'm no less a mom, I'm told.
I've fiddled for morris dance for years, but not the last two: I'm still expected to bring the fiddle to parties and things, grin!
We're of an age - so perhaps we can take turns with these affirmations:
You Are a writer, just as you realized by the fact that your published works we love live on, and you are a writer, even if you are currently blocked or just on severe Pause with the current piece and don't know when or if you'll get out your pen and write again. May it be soon, for a definition of soon that really fits your life as you are living it, and may that be richly, fully, and with delight in yourself and all around you; with the nurturing delight of all your friends and friendly-acquaintances near and far.
So go put on that fabulous neckalce and wear all that love and those good wishes and all that affirmation of YOU, that are wrapped up in it, and add in warm well-wishing from this friendly-acquaintance. Oh, I'm not at all sure we ever met, I don't recall; I did SCA in college and got to only a few MNSTF events, but we assuredly have bunches of friends in common.
Courage, sister.It's not that important that it wasn't what you were asking for, but I'm convinced it can't do harm.
What you are now, and what you'll be as you grow up, in cycles as they go, you'll figure it out. And I'll be glad to hear your working it out on these recycled electrons, just as I'm figuring out the same sorts of things over here in my corner of the world.
onward and sideways...
Re: you keep that necklace!
Date: 2005-07-07 04:33 pm (UTC)Re: you keep that necklace!
Date: 2005-07-07 08:50 pm (UTC)How true, how true.
Re: you keep that necklace!
Date: 2005-07-07 10:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 04:15 am (UTC)I myself have had to deal with this as well: as you know, I'm a musician...but I used to identify myself as a bassist...in fact, I was pretty damn good and was about to turn it into my full-time profession...and then my hands got really bad...not only could I not play bass, I couldn't perform for long periods of time anymore, on any instrument...so not only could I no longer identify myself as a bassist, I could no longer identify myself as a performer...it's been two years, and I'm still in the midst of change: I've gone more toward video scoring, digital recording and composition and it's starting to work out pretty well, but only at a non-professional level so far...
Still, I'm a musician...but it's taken me awhile to realize that...the change was hard and it took me a long time to figure out what my identity was after it...and I believe that's what you're up against as well...I look forward to reading what you figure out...but also, as a fellow artist, I understand completely what you're up against...no one is bigger critic of the artist than the artist themselves...and critique can be brutal in the midst of transition...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 04:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 05:07 am (UTC)Mothering
Date: 2005-07-07 05:18 am (UTC)As far as "what the hell do I want to be?" You are Peg Kerr, Mom,...then start filling in the blanks (I don't know you well enough to know what other hats you wear). If those are all you want for right now, then do, relax and be them. If not, then only the limitations that you put on yourself can stop you. I learned that lesson myself the hard way.
Re: Mothering
Date: 2005-07-08 01:49 am (UTC)That was one odd thing about the ice palace book. When I started it, I desperately wanted to get pregnant again, but alas, 'twas not to be.
Maybe that's why the book's blocked!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 05:31 am (UTC)Life comes and goes with certain viscittudes and rhythms. You may want to give the writing a break for a while, come back to it later, and explore other aspects of your life for a while. Maybe that will provide something new. Or you'll discover that you've been waiting for something new to write about, and your writing will take off in a completely new direction. Maybe you'll want to write something for the girls, or maybe you'll end up doing poetry. Who knows....Give it some time and don't worry too much. *hugs from afar*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 12:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:33 pm (UTC)I think most of us, but Americans more so than others, have their identities very much caught up in their work. "And what do you do?" is the first question after an introduction (which would be considered rude in some cultures).
Like others have commented, maybe it's enough to be. You are loved and you love. You've proven you can write if you want to. So what if you don't want to write right now? Everything in it's season.
Oh, suddenly I'm reminded of Kiki's Delivery Service.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 01:34 pm (UTC)Sounds like some real soul-searching is in order (something I'm going through, here!). I wish you all the luck in the world!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 02:43 pm (UTC)Under no circumstances.
I hope you find a way forward that works for you, and will be cheering for you whatever it is. I have greatly enjoyed The Wild Swans and should be very happy were there more writing of yours to look forward to, but not to the extent of wanting it if it's not what you want to be or do.
The way you talk about the details of your day-to-day life is a recurring joy to read, and I for one look forward to seeing your posts.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 03:42 pm (UTC)Whether or not you write another book, whether or not you ever make a cent from writing again, you are still Peg Kerr. Not just Mom or karate student or wife or writer, you are still *you*.
We came because of your prior books, but we stay because of Peg Kerr, not because of the promise of more books. We stay because you allow us the privilege of knowing, at least in virtua, a wonderful person.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 04:31 pm (UTC)The answer I seem to be coming to for myself is that, while I may eventually try again to become a published writer, right now isn't the time. My son's needs are high, and his other parent's ability to assist low. I have sole responsibility for keeping a roof over our heads and keeping that roof in good repair. (My son's out of town for two weeks. If I were a Real Writer, I'd be using this time to write; instead, I'm using this time to do seven-years-overdue floor renovations.) I can design myself a sweater much more easily than I can design a plot right now, and the sweater is much easier to work on in odd moments and suffers less from interruption.
It'd be nice to get some of these stories out of my head and into other people's hands, and once that was the driving wish of my life, but right now there are other things that are more important to me. Sometimes it does still bother me that I'm not writing, but I've spent way too much butt-in-chair hands-on-keyboard time over the past three years with nothing to show for it but a couple pieces of fanfic. I'd rather spend that time making my home a pleasant place for me to relax and do things, actually relaxing and doing things, building my relationship with my boyfriend, and working with my son. Eventually the writing might come back -- it has before -- but if not, well, I've still finished three novel manuscripts, and I've got some interesting folks in my head to check in with once in a while.
(And you should keep the necklace. Even if you end up scrapping the Ice Palace novel and writing a novel set in an active volcano instead.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 04:35 pm (UTC)I think that Emerald House Rising and The Wild Swans give you the absolute right to call yourself an author (in the badge of honor sense) any time you like. Even at three in the morning on a sleepless night, talking to yourself. Even if you never write another word.
And for the other sense ... if you're not doing it now, no, you're not working as a professional or obsessional writer. That can hurt. I used to be a college professor -- family trade, I was the third generation -- and got denied tenure and wound up with a good industry job. It still stings, not being a teacher anymore, even ten years later. I'm pretty happy with what I've been doing in those years, but losing something that was big and important to me is like losing a finger: a wound which never fully heals.
At which point, I suppose, there's nothing to do but hold on to your white gemstone (or book reviews, or whatever it may be), and whimper for a while.
Except that you and I, unlike some hobbits and other finger-amputees, might get to do it again.
Best wishes....
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 06:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 08:17 pm (UTC)I have the evidence to believe that 'Writer' is part of my identity, but also to know that writing is not the whole story of who or what I am. I think I push myself away from writing when that role becomes more important in my mind than the larger sense of my identity as a complete human being.
Harper Lee and Walter M Miller, Jr. are definitely writers, but it would be a sad thing if their whole lives had been about nothing else than those single books they are known for. A good book is a wonderful thing: one that enhances life, builds bridges between the worlds of our imaginations, contributes to the fund of human culture and knowledge, et alia. But I don't think any book is more important than a real, caring, vibrant human life lived among others of our kind.
I expect we will both write when writing is what best fits that whole picture of who we are.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-07 08:23 pm (UTC)Maybe you're looking at that from the wrong angle. I'm 42. I don't know what I'm going to be when I "grow up" and I don't really want to know. I don't feel grown up. I figure that when I stop growing, it will be time to die. I don't think there's any magical time when you're "all grown up". I don't want to stop growing and learning and I'm fairly sure that the process of doing those things will continue to change who and what I am.
As for whether or not you are a writer, I'd say you are, even if you never finish another book. What we are is a combination of what we've been and what we're becoming. You have written two books - books that I very much enjoyed. That means you're a writer. You're also other things as well. None of us are totally defined by just one of the things we are, at least not if we're normal healthy human beings. Some times one of the things we are takes prescedence, sometimes another does. If you want to write fiction, you should continue to write fiction. If you're now at a place in your growing where that isn't what you want to do, or isn't what is working for you, then there's nothing wrong with putting it aside for now, or even forever if that is what is right for you. Putting it aside doesn't change what you've already done.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-08 02:03 am (UTC)hugh prather
Date: 2005-07-08 02:51 am (UTC)Notes to Myself
by Hugh Prather? I believe you would enjoy it very much.
Let me know if you have read it and, if so, what you thought. If not, I will personally buy you a copy.
(I have an autographed copy...lucky me!!)
Re: hugh prather
Date: 2005-07-08 11:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-08 03:08 am (UTC)Also, I know everyone else has said this, but... You've published two novels, one of which is particularly beloved by a bunch of people, you're the mother of two fabulous daughters, it seems like you have a good relationship with your husband, you're studying karate, you have a lot of friends who care about you, and you have a steady job that you don't utterly detest. You're already a success. That doesn't mean you shouldn't want to change your life, but seriously, you're starting from a place that a lot of people never reach. I'm not saying count your blessing so much as be proud of your accomplishments, because they'll give you confidence when you move on to the next thing.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-08 06:02 am (UTC)I'm glad you wrote the entry and left on the comments, both were brave. I'm not sure where this journey will lead you, but good luck with it Peg. I hope it brings you the best of all possible things.
Later comment
Date: 2005-07-11 09:10 pm (UTC)come for the writing, stay for the pie
Date: 2005-07-12 11:45 am (UTC)i didn't actually know that you *were* a professional writer when i started reading your journal--your books were like a marvelous bonus but i originally friended you because i loved the way you wrote in your journal (and i had a small enough friends list that it made sense to friend a stranger just to enjoy reading her writing). i don't think that you've been feeling passionate about the ice palace book and i don't know whether it's the wrong book or the wrong medium or what--but it's clear from your journal that you can write and write when it *is* something you feel passion about--so follow your passion.
one of your great gifts that i have loved reading your writings about is the way that you explain compassion and tolerance for glbt issues from the viewpoint of a straight, religious ally. if you are looking for something non-fiction-y to hold forth about, you might collect your entries on that subject and see what that would assemble into.
we're the same age (well i'm probably a little older but i'm still 45 at the moment) and if you've been reading my journal (and who has the time?) then you know that i've spent the past year and a half discovering that i was not many things that i thought i was and i was a bunch of other stuff instead, at least for right now. it's been terrifying, but kind of fun once i let go and decided to enjoy the ride. enjoy, and thanks for taking us along on the journey.
*hug if welcome*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-14 07:17 pm (UTC)For years I had imposter syndrome about being a computer programmer. In the end I decided that I really wasn't one, and went off to do something else. But I hadn't realised until just now that some aspects of that are silly; of course I was a computer programmer, I did write code, and the fact that I ended up deciding that I wasn't very good at it nor did I want to be doesn't invalidate the 3 or so years I spent doing it.
But I hadn't realised that until now, so thank you.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 02:19 am (UTC)You haven't written anything here in a long time, which is worrying. I hope that you are well and that whatever you are doing gives you joy and satisfaction.