Know thy neighbor
Aug. 18th, 2005 12:35 pmNewsweek mentioned in this article a website that is now available to inform parents about sex offenders living in their neighborhoods. This site, mapsexoffenders.com worked well for me; it is free, requires no registration, and is very easy to use and includes the offenders' stats and photograph. They have 34 states mapped so far.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 06:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 07:24 pm (UTC)permission to steal?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 09:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 06:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 06:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 07:04 pm (UTC)It's pragmatic. I don't know of any kind of crime with a higher rate of recidivism, aside from those involving addictions. If someone is convicted and serves time for shoplifting, or for assault and battery, maybe they'll have changed over the course of time. Sex offenders--not so much.
And yet...and yet.
There aren't any registered, living near me. I clicked on the few who showed up living a few miles away....I was worried I'd recognize them from work, but I didn't.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:26 pm (UTC)Heh.
It's all right. I was half-expecting some much harsher responses; yours is entirely polite.
Unfortunately, I /don't/ have good references to give you, because my information comes mainly from classes and workshops, reinforced by the statements of colleagues when I've been working in the field, and not from reading. I could try to find references, but I wouldn't have any more tools than anyone else for doing so. A year ago - and possibly a year from now - I might be working with people I could ask, but at the moment I'm not.
I have to say that, although I'd be interested in any findings, initially I'd have a hard time believing something that claimed low rates. It's not just that everything I've encountered so far has been pretty much unanimously of the opposite opinion. It's also that, to the extent that I'm able to try to understand the nature of the offense, it makes sense to me that it would be nearly impossible to change entirely.
(I should say, especially in light of
This is an area I've worked in, studied in, and thought a lot about, for personal as well as professional reasons. Most of my work has involved the effect of the offense on the victim, rather than the perpetrator, but the two are linked in complex ways. And with children - which is the group I work with most - it's often easy to see both sides in the same person, very clearly.
Which all comes down to saying, "I believe it to be true because I have been told it by many, many people whose knowledge and expertise I trust, in many different settings, and because my intuition doesn't rebel against what they've said. But I don't have any good sources I can point you toward."
I'm sorry. I wish I did.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:36 pm (UTC)I googled "sex offenders recidivism rate" and got 82000 hits.
The top five were:
http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/docs/sxoffend/page1.htm
http://www.csom.org/pubs/recidsexof.html
http://www.sexoffender.com/sorecidivism_review.html
http://www.corr.ca.gov/SexOffenders/Sex%20Offender%20Recidivism%20Rates.ppt
http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/csot/csot_trecidivism.shtm
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:57 pm (UTC)The CSOM paper, your #2, seems to be fairly wide-ranging and doesn't show obvious signs of rabid political opinions overriding the science. And it appears to say, reading between the lines, that reporting is so sporadic that we can't really know just yet.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 07:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:09 pm (UTC)The Minnesota site gives the specific statute they were convicted under (just by number, so you have to then track it down), so you can find out what it is they're registered for doing.
The whole thing makes me feel rather slimey.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 07:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 07:42 pm (UTC)If we're sentencing these people to be unable to work forever, do you think we ought to give them pensions after we let them out of prison? It seems wrong, somehow, but if we're going to refuse to employ them at anything, ever, I can't think what the alternative is.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 07:51 pm (UTC)Seriously, without the kids being around, I don't think it would matter to me much.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 10:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-18 11:32 pm (UTC)I think being informed about people who might be a danger is common sense; I would let a registered sex offender into my home, either.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-19 12:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-08-19 01:00 am (UTC)I entered in my address, because, lets face it, it's pretty hard to resist doing and came up with a sex offender only a few blocks away. A man convicted for a sexual encounter with a 15 yr old. It would have been easy to be judgemental, but I checked out his age. He's 18.
Does he deserve to pop up all over the internet for a consensual sex act with someone he was likely in high school with? This is my issue with things like this.
You cannot keep your child safe from all harm. You educate them, love them, give them good values (and street smarts). And when they are minors, you watch them like a hawk.
I think things like this end up doing more harm than good.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 07:54 pm (UTC)http://talkleft.com/new_archives/012181.html
B
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 08:23 pm (UTC)My opinion of my government has fallen, if that were possible. My opinion of the apologists who follow in lockstep behend my government has fallen.
B
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-06 09:27 pm (UTC)As for an example of how my opinion of my fellow Americans has risen, here's an amazing first-person account of one of the nurses who was evacuated Friday from Methodist Hospital in NO.