Here is the proclamation. This isn't the minimum wage, as I thought initially, but wages governed by the Davis-Bacon wage determination. See article explaining here and here.
You know what this means, don't you? More profits for Halliburton!
Oh yes, and you saw that gasoline emission standards are being relaxed, too.
What's next? Go ahead, speculate. How far will he go?
You know what this means, don't you? More profits for Halliburton!
Oh yes, and you saw that gasoline emission standards are being relaxed, too.
What's next? Go ahead, speculate. How far will he go?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 07:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 07:42 pm (UTC)And I wouldn't mind about the emissions suspension, except I wonder who it's supposed to benefit? As far as I can tell, the people who had cars are gone, and surely passing their annual safety inspection is not going to be their /biggest/ worry when they get back? The only sense I can make of this is that it's not about the vehicles of residents, it's about the vehicles of rescue/recovery people. And again, if I thought that this was somehow going to make it easier for Jane Helpful-Person to get down there and help out, I'd be cheering, but Jane Helpful-Person has been turned away in no uncertain terms. And it can't be to enable erzatz evacuation vehicles for the same reason. So what we're talking about, I can only deduce, is that Bush is making dispensations for the government-agency vehicles not to have to meet safety specs.
Why? Why do governmental vehicles not meet specs? And why was this worth anybody's time, with so much else that still needs to be addressed? And - this is my big question - when do you suppose the regulations will be restored?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 07:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 07:58 pm (UTC)Just how are people going to be able to rebuild and have the economy in the area go back to normal if they can't make even minimum wage from any job that's involved with the rebuilding? (which I would imagine would be a fair number of the jobs available when they do start recontstruction)
Minimum wage isn't even considered "Living Wage". Below minimum wage is just criminal.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:03 pm (UTC)Sigh. I should stop being surprised by things.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-10 08:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-10 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:11 pm (UTC)Still majorly sucky.
Especially since you get what you pay for.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:31 pm (UTC)The normal minimum wage (a pitiful $5.15 an hour in most of the country) is not effected here, I don't think.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:57 pm (UTC)You know what this means, don't you? More profits for Halliburton! Hurrah!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:33 pm (UTC)But it's the kind of thing that seems very susceptible to abuse, and which, like so much of what the federal government does, has the look of something which will benefit the people who already have money at the expense of those who don't.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:49 pm (UTC)Oh, I'm with you on that. But I like to be able to defend myself to people who don't have this knee-jerk reflex, and so details and reasons come in handy.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:56 pm (UTC)You know what this means, don't you? More profits for Halliburton! Hurrah!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 09:09 pm (UTC)IN other disgusting hurricane-related news, did you hear that Sen. Rick Santorum supposedly said that people who didn't evacuate should be punished for not doing so? I need to move to another state so that that man can't claim to represent me.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 09:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 10:19 pm (UTC)Does any one have a link to that? I need to pass that on to others.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 11:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 08:40 pm (UTC)Welcome to the new America. The "kinder, gentler" America. The America in which the rich get richer and the poor suck it up.
I want to know when people are going to wake up and act on their own best interests for a change.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 10:04 pm (UTC)Erm, I'm afraid to speculate in case anyone in the administration saw it and got ideas. ;) He reminds me of a boy in my daughter's class who was told very specifically by the science teacher, when they were using catapults, NOT to use them to embed things in the ceiling of the classroom. As soon as the words were out of her mouth she saw that the wheels were turning in this kid's head, that she'd given him ideas...
I used to think that his dad was scarier because he actually had half a brain; now I see that Dubya's lack of brain AND lack of scruples is far more dangerous. I honestly think this administration is far scarier than terrorists at this point and worry far more about the havoc they are wreaking on the country.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 10:23 pm (UTC)How can those who grew up in the Nixon-era sit back and not be shocked at the lack of public outcry? Or rather watch public outcries being blatantly ignored?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-09 11:03 pm (UTC)How low will he go?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-09-10 04:24 am (UTC)