(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-16 10:12 pm (UTC)
It wouldn't get one's goat quite so, except that we are told early and often that Scalia, Roberts, and Alito are Strict Constitutional Interpreters and not the sort of vile activist judges who would decide a case on their own biased vision of how the world would best work. It should have been an open-and-shut case, as the First Congress gave helpful hints like "[T]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects," and not "[U]m, like, until the police are sufficiently professional that they don't need external oversight any more."
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

pegkerr: (Default)
pegkerr

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678 910
1112131415 1617
1819202122 2324
2526272829 3031

Peg Kerr, Author

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags