A scientific experiment
Nov. 28th, 2005 07:54 amI sat the family down at dinner last night for a little talk. "I have a confession to make. For the last week and a half, I have been running a little experiment."
On Rob's birthday, on the fifteenth of November, he opened his presents in the living room. All the ripped up wrapping paper was left in the middle of the living room floor. Ever since, I have not touched the paper and I have not commented on it. I wanted to see whether it would occur to anyone in this family to pick up that paper and throw it away.
It didn't occur to anyone. No one seemed to notice it. For thirteen days.
So, in our conversation last night, I simply pointed this out. "The thing is," I said, "I think you all walked past that paper without a second thought because you all assumed it was my job to pick it up and dispose of it, because I can't stand mess and it doesn't bother you. It has gotten to the point that I don't feel that anything would get done in this house unless I point it out to people and make them do it. And I don't want to do that anymore."
I told the girls that I had told them no less than four times yesterday to pick up their coats and put them in the coat box. We talked about the fact that we have a chore chart, and they had agreed that the chores I had asked them to do were reasonable (one daily chore and three weekly chores each), but that they were going undone. I asked them whether we should start applying consequences for undone chores, and if so, what they should be. Rob objected that maybe we weren't at that point yet, and instead we should give them a second chance. I thought privately that as one of the worst offenders in the family of failing to pick up after himself, Rob would naturally want a million second chances, but I agreed to let it go for now and see if people would more willingly do their chores, and we would re-visit the issues in two weeks. At that point, if things have not changes, I will insist on setting up a consequences system.
It was a good conversation, and a hard conversation. Both girls cried a lot.
This article that
sdn pointed to, about the unfair division of work at home, based on gender lines, seems particularly timely.
On Rob's birthday, on the fifteenth of November, he opened his presents in the living room. All the ripped up wrapping paper was left in the middle of the living room floor. Ever since, I have not touched the paper and I have not commented on it. I wanted to see whether it would occur to anyone in this family to pick up that paper and throw it away.
It didn't occur to anyone. No one seemed to notice it. For thirteen days.
So, in our conversation last night, I simply pointed this out. "The thing is," I said, "I think you all walked past that paper without a second thought because you all assumed it was my job to pick it up and dispose of it, because I can't stand mess and it doesn't bother you. It has gotten to the point that I don't feel that anything would get done in this house unless I point it out to people and make them do it. And I don't want to do that anymore."
I told the girls that I had told them no less than four times yesterday to pick up their coats and put them in the coat box. We talked about the fact that we have a chore chart, and they had agreed that the chores I had asked them to do were reasonable (one daily chore and three weekly chores each), but that they were going undone. I asked them whether we should start applying consequences for undone chores, and if so, what they should be. Rob objected that maybe we weren't at that point yet, and instead we should give them a second chance. I thought privately that as one of the worst offenders in the family of failing to pick up after himself, Rob would naturally want a million second chances, but I agreed to let it go for now and see if people would more willingly do their chores, and we would re-visit the issues in two weeks. At that point, if things have not changes, I will insist on setting up a consequences system.
It was a good conversation, and a hard conversation. Both girls cried a lot.
This article that
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 02:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 02:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 02:41 pm (UTC)I remember having a conversation like this with my mother when I was about 17: that was the time it finally clicked. I'm willing to cut a lot more slack for kids than adults. Kids spend so many years being forbidden to meddle with many of the contents of their house, they develop a set of blinders that screens out a lot of what's there. The wrapping paper on the floor is lumped with the crystal wine glasses that they shouldn't use for their juice, and just not seen.
The doesn't excuse the coats, nor does it excuse Rob.
The gender lines article annoyed me; the author clearly feels that I have failed women as a group by choosing to stay home with my children, and the solution to this is to step up the pressure on women not to do that. In other words, I should feel really, really, really guilty for choosing to stay home when I have a college education, and by the way, caring for children is incredibly boring and unfulfilling, even if I find it interesting and rewarding. And to her I would like to say: ppppbbbbbthhhht. I agree about the housework, though. I hate housework.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 02:55 pm (UTC)But I note that everyone always wants to be in my space, lying on my bed studying (theirs are wrecks)--and when I point it out, all I get is "Oh, Mom, quit nagging."
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 03:24 pm (UTC)the article was very interesting. a lot of the statistics are bothersome, but i don't agree with the conclusions she draws. maybe she is right that the only way to make a difference in how women are treated (whether at home or in the workplace) is for them to, well, act like successful men. but i also think that she (and society) need(s) to learn to value things other than workplace/corporate success and making money. i guess that was what bothered me the most - her suggestion that women who do the child rearing are not making as important a contribution, etc.
that said, i don't know if i'd ever feel completely filled doing 'just' the child-rearing. luckily, i am aiming for a profession in which (i think) i can work part time without feeling significantly less succcessful than those who work full time.
hmmm. anyway, long ramble that probably belongs more in my journal than in yours. but here it is....
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 03:25 pm (UTC)Today, I no longer wash dishes - it's now his sole responsibility (although I do wash dishes from time to time). He now has his tasks and he does them. If they don't get done, I don't do them. Period.
Good luck,
Susan
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 03:28 pm (UTC)I like her already. Interesting piece. THanks.
Let's try this again
Date: 2005-11-28 03:34 pm (UTC)I have this conversation with my children just about daily. We have consequences. They don't work. I am unwilling to make them more severe. I can only conclude that I have very stubborn, unaware children who really don't mind walking over trash and clothes, even when I point out the scorpions I shake out of the pants they leave on the floor. It's just not a priority for them, and consequences don't make it one. I just have to be willing to stand over them and make them do it over and over and over and over again, and hope it sinks in by their fourth year in college.
Second chances are a bad idea. They become thirds, and fourths, and then any time you call a halt you're an unfeeling mean horrible monster. There's a *reason* I'm VoldeMom. I stop the cycle early. If I told you twice, and you didn't do it? You had your chance. And now the toy's mine, or the skirt you begged for is getting goodwilled, or you can't watch that DVD again, or you have to go to bed now without dinner, or you ruined the evening for everyone when we left the restaurant early, or you get spanked. I wish I could say this means I have responsive, attentive children. Nope.
Good luck.
~Amanda
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 03:56 pm (UTC)I work for a large corporation, and have known for years that the high-pressure track wasn't for me. I know people, men and women both, who thrive in this environment. I also know men and women both who would bail out tomorrow but for the financial considerations. I can count on one hand the people I know who seem to love their jobs.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 04:04 pm (UTC)We had a similar kind of system to what you're using with your chores when I was growing up. With three kids in the family, the chores were divided into three groups centered around a room: kitchen, living room, bathroom. These rotated each week. Kitchen chores included setting the table and doing the dishes each night. All three had a weekly cleaning of the room in question included. What made the weekly chores tolerable to me as a kid was that my siblings were doing theirs at the same time. Maybe having a family chore time each week would help your family not only get the chores done, but come to see them as something that should be done not because you say so, but because they truly make things better. (Having a little celebration in the newly-cleaned living room so everyone sees how nice it is might be a good idea.)
As always, best of luck.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 04:05 pm (UTC)I have a vague idea that I should be focusing on positrive reinforcment but don't really know how.
About the article you linked to. Right on. Two bist struck me:
If women’s flourishing does matter, feminists must acknowledge that the family is to 2005 what the workplace was to 1964 and the vote to 1920.
There are three rules: Prepare yourself to qualify for good work, treat work seriously, and don’t put yourself in a position of unequal resources when you marry.
The "thing" that keeps me in the workforce is a dire fear of poverty. I grew up poor, after my dad died and my mom was unable to re-enter the workforce. I wonder, though, if my daughters will not be motivated to be financially independent.
My pet peve is that routine housework seems to be my responsibility, with hubby "helping", because there's always some new home improvement project that he "has" to attend to.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 04:05 pm (UTC)I'm currently in the early stages of this teaching process with Meg, but it's already frustrating. "Don't just drop that on the floor PUT IT BACK IN YOUR ROOM!" I wish you luck, especially since you have a spouse who is an accessory to the crimes.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 04:11 pm (UTC)...and this is what the author of the article seems to be ignoring. Most people, even well educated, well paid people, have jobs, not deep, meaningful careers. If there was a way for most men to "opt out", by golly they would. My brother in law is a house husband and stay at home dad and LOVES IT.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 04:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 04:25 pm (UTC)I think you handled that beautifully, as always.
Also, in case you missed it (there were lots of icons!) - in honor of your lovely family:
:)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 04:49 pm (UTC)Susan
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 05:01 pm (UTC)I think that was well done. I wish we'd had more conversations like that in my family growing up -- I think it would have made a big difference.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 05:05 pm (UTC)I can't get the dogs to do any housework at all, though, the lazy things. All they do is lie around the house and shed, day in and day out.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 05:07 pm (UTC)May I suggest a book?
Try Don't Shoot the Dog by Karen Pryor.
Its kept in Psychology in your local bookstore (or it is at Borders and Barnes and Noble, anyway) -- its a fantastic behaviour modification manual using 100% positive reinforcement. Not that I necessarily recommend 100% positive reinforcement for all instances, but its a fantastic book for getting the theory down. Best of all -- I learnt about it from a cadaver search dog class, but as soon as I got back to work (I was working in a bookstore at the time) the thing that made it really stick for me is the local Community College was having a seminar on teaching children and ordered 36 copies of it for their seminar.
I've seen the techniques used on (and used them myself) dogs, cats, children, spouses, employees and employers, roommates, squirrels, birds, dolphins, horses.... they work on everything I've seen them used on, because its such an elemental concept. The book is really good at explaining this.
I really really recommend it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 05:09 pm (UTC)Part of this is my own fault as I have a horror of nagging, and part of it is reasonable with
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 05:40 pm (UTC)Good luck with retraining your family.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 06:06 pm (UTC)It is very worth nagging and consquencing the kids to care for their own messes. They may not do it perfectly but the idea will get into their heads that THEY are responsible for their own mess, that there is no cosmic maid and NO, Mom =/= Maid. When they are out in the world, the lessons will slowly bubble up to the surface.
I don't know about you but the reason I usually just pick stuff up is because I'm there, it'll get done quickly and I do it "right". The other half of the process of getting your kids and mate to be equal partners is to let go of it being done "right". I've had a hard time with that.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-11-28 06:31 pm (UTC)Thanks!
About that article
Date: 2005-11-28 06:36 pm (UTC)I think there is a kernel that she, and most feminists, want to ignore in turn: if it is the case, across societies and cultures, that women do most of the domestic management and men do more of the providing--maybe it's not just cultural. In the broadest sense of generality: Maybe we really *are* wired differently, to gravitate naturally to different preferences.
Have you ever read "Women's Work: The First 20,000 Years" by Elizabeth Barber? It's an analysis of why the division of labor fell out the way it did, from earliest on. Plus she's a very good writer.
~Amanda, whose childhood dream was to be a stay-at-home mom but fell into a career when she discovered something she loved to do and a company who respects it; married to a man who always wanted to support his family so I could do anything I wanted, but who is now looking longingly at retiring and being a stay-at-home dad