![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, I should be in a good mood. Democrats have taken the house, Minnesota is finally FINALLY sending a woman to the Senate, we've just elected a strong progressive to the House in my district, the State House has changed hands to the Democrats. And Santorum has been defeated! I am truly happy about that. Dan Savage, have fun gloating.
But I'm feeling pissy. We lost the governorship by One. Lousy. Point. Hutchinson supporters, I hope you're bloody satisfied. Thanks for voting your consciences; now we're stuck with another four years of Pawlenty gutting the state.
And my state is sending an utter BIGOT to Congress.
I'm also pissed about all the states that outlawed even civil unions, never mind passing marriage amendments.
(Maybe I'll feel better after I've had breakfast.)
But I'm feeling pissy. We lost the governorship by One. Lousy. Point. Hutchinson supporters, I hope you're bloody satisfied. Thanks for voting your consciences; now we're stuck with another four years of Pawlenty gutting the state.
And my state is sending an utter BIGOT to Congress.
I'm also pissed about all the states that outlawed even civil unions, never mind passing marriage amendments.
(Maybe I'll feel better after I've had breakfast.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 12:49 pm (UTC)A big middle finger to the voters of the 6th CD and their 'Christian' values. At least Walz won the 1st out from under Gutknecht's nose.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 12:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 05:05 pm (UTC)*Groan* As a Christian, I'm asking you to PLEASE not call Bachmann's hateful views "Christian values."
That's downright slander, that is.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 01:24 pm (UTC)I'm also pissed about all the states that outlawed even civil unions, never mind passing marriage amendments.
(Maybe I'll feel better after I've had breakfast.)
I've had breakfast, and I don't feel any better over here in WI. They upheld the damned marriage amendment here, which obliterates the possibility of civil unions as well. Now it's probably going to be a couple of decades to unseat that piece of dip**** legislation.
Pawlenty...
Date: 2006-11-08 03:24 pm (UTC)- D
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 03:29 pm (UTC)I'm still having problems with that this morning.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 03:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:46 pm (UTC)That was the only time I've ever made a political speech in my classrooms. I taught college students many of whom were voting for the first time. I told them they needed to vote and I really didn't care how they voted EXCEPT I felt it was an abdication of responsibility to check the Republican or Democrat box at the top of the ballot and turn it in. The least we can do is actually mark each person's name or position that we're voting for.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 03:54 pm (UTC)Some people buy into that mindset, I guess. Thankfully, the majority of voters didn't.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:49 pm (UTC)I wish we could hold a school for all future candidates and show them what he did. It would be a kind of campaign season I wouldn't mind watching.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 03:39 pm (UTC)B
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 03:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:26 pm (UTC)P.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:29 pm (UTC)That said, I'm not going to buy into the defeatist thinking that anything short of a complete sweep of every race down to city council in every district is a defeat. That's Republican spin -- that because they still control the Senate (if they do), because they didn't lose every contested race, that it's not really a victory for the Democrats.
And the anti-DP measures (especially Virginia's, which is even more sweeping than most) really stings, but isn't surprising -- it looks like it was defeated in Arizona, which would be the first time that's ever happened, and I take small consolation from that.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:43 pm (UTC)BTW, your icon is delightful.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:59 pm (UTC)Voting *for* the instant-runoff system, of course, will vastly improve the ability to vote your conscience *and* sanely at the same time.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 05:28 pm (UTC)I'm not a part of the problem if I vote for the person that I want to win. The problem is complex and has a lot of pieces, but actually voting for the candidate you support is not one of those pieces. Look to a two party system that has solidified into near law; look at the conventional wisdom that says no third party candidate can win because people will game the system. Look at lots of places, but don't look to those people who cast their ballots honestly.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 07:47 pm (UTC)That's about the politest response I can make.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 08:19 pm (UTC)It's a long term view. I cling to it in the hopes that it will eventually work out.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 04:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 06:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 07:47 pm (UTC)That's about the politest response I can make.
Pardon me, but...
Date: 2006-11-08 06:28 pm (UTC)I'm tempted to just say, "You're welcome", and leave it at that, but I didn't vote for Hutchinson.
Some years back I was at a friend's party just prior to a presidential election. One of the other guests started talking about Nader supporters, and how foolish they were-- or something along those lines.
That's when I piped up with, "Oh, you mean people like me?" While he didn't run out of the room, the shocked expression on his face was pretty priceless.
Frankly, I'd much rather a candidate or issue I supported lost in an election where people came out in droves &/or voted how they really believed.
Re: Pardon me, but...
Date: 2006-11-08 07:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 07:21 pm (UTC)But nationally, I'm extremely happy.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 08:09 pm (UTC)I strongly suspect that the Supreme Court will strike down the anti-civil-union amendments, even if, I grant you, they probably wouldn't at present strike down the anti-gay-marriage ones. Roberts is a conservative, but so, supposedly, were the ones Eisenhower appointed. (With Scalito, mmm, yeah. No room for doubt.)
I would not be surprised if Roe v. Wade turns out to hang on the Virginia Senate results. A switch in committee chairs has such an effect on
whose nominationwhat makes it to the floor for a vote.(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 08:27 pm (UTC)I was hoping Hatch would be elected and he could get to work on helping the college students. I have 3 kids in school here in Mn. and it is a killer to pay those tuitions. Also was hoping we get moving on the stem cell research. Mabye these things will happen now with the sea change...
But we are sending Amy and she will shake things up! We need to think positive! Yea!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-08 08:44 pm (UTC)Ruddy lack of residency... I can't vote in Congressionals/Gubernatorials.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-09 07:39 am (UTC)We've got a Hutchinson here, too, and she's a bloody idiot. But she has her core supporters.
Maybe we can get rid of the OTHER US Senator Idiot next time....