As I mentioned in a comment to another post, the camera model and serial number appear to be in the EXIF data of the images posted (I'm not sure there aren't multiple sets, so make that "the one set I checked"). This should make things considerably easier for Scholastic's lawyers :-). And is a really basic dumb-ass mistake.
Also he did a bad job taking the pictures; he should have selected manual exposure and fiddled until he got a good readable image and then gone with that, instead of just leaving it in auto. (Speaking here as somebody who has photographed one magazine serial and one hardcover book that I didn't want to subject to the strain of going onto a flatbed scanner.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-20 03:35 pm (UTC)Also he did a bad job taking the pictures; he should have selected manual exposure and fiddled until he got a good readable image and then gone with that, instead of just leaving it in auto. (Speaking here as somebody who has photographed one magazine serial and one hardcover book that I didn't want to subject to the strain of going onto a flatbed scanner.)