Beowulf vs. Lord of the Rings
Nov. 20th, 2007 10:29 amAn interesting essay over at Salon.com, Beowulf vs. Lord of the Rings: "One is a living universe, the other a 3-D voyage to schlockville. A great essay by Tolkien ["The Monsters and the Critics"] helps us understand why."
I winced on Neil Gaiman's behalf upon reading this. I'll admit I wasn't much inclined to see the Beowulf movie to begin with. I still want to read the Seamus Heaney translation, though.
I winced on Neil Gaiman's behalf upon reading this. I'll admit I wasn't much inclined to see the Beowulf movie to begin with. I still want to read the Seamus Heaney translation, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-20 06:14 pm (UTC)What packs them in at the multiplex?
Date: 2007-11-21 12:29 am (UTC)Whatever its historical and literary virtues, this is not a story that is going to pack them in at the local multiplex."
Um. OK, I know I'm out of touch with modern movies, but isn't "Monster has been killing people, (doubtless several of them attractive young people who recklessly snuck out to have illicit sex,) Hero struggles hard to kill the Monster, then has to struggle even harder to kill an even worse monster, but finally succeeds, and gets gifts and honor." one of the basic plots? I thought some version of this was usually one of the choices packing them in at the local multiplex. My best guess is that he means everything he thinks is important about Beowulf are the parts this leaves out, but he didn't say that.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-11-21 03:08 am (UTC)