(no subject)

Date: 2008-02-04 10:59 pm (UTC)
I took so long writing my comment, that many others commented ahead... now that I've gone back to read those comments, I'm sincerely shocked. I didn't see the article as a slam against ANYONE with clinical depression at all. Not even a little bit. I saw it straightforward, as an article saying that as a society we've lost the distinction between depression and sadness, particularly when it comes to psychiatry. Being depressed doesn't mean you're just sad and need to cheer up. Likewise, being sad doesn't mean your brain chemistry needs to be 'fixed'. I feel almost at a lost reading the others' comments, because I didn't pick up on those interpretations at all while reading it. I felt like it just briefly gave a few artistic anecdotes, but that wasn't the drive of the article. I didn't feel like the article was conflates depression and sadness, but does just the opposite.

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

pegkerr: (Default)
pegkerr

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678 910
1112131415 1617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Peg Kerr, Author

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags