Is my irritation unreasonable?
Apr. 29th, 2008 09:02 amI made an appointment with a doctor for 7:40 a.m. this morning. This is a short appointment which occurs every one to three months and has for, um, the past eight years or so (I think???). I like the early morning appointments because I don't have to take any time off work.
I got there and waited. Gradually, it became clear that the doctor hadn't arrived, and the 7:00 a.m. and 7:20 a.m. appointment were still waiting, too. The 7:20 a.m. lady called the back office, discovered that the doctor thought his appointments didn't start today until 8:00, decided she couldn't wait any longer, and left in a snit.
I called and checked the home voice mail; yes, the doctor's office had called to confirm that the appointment was TODAY at 7:40 A.M. I decided to wait until the doctor showed up.
8:00 a.m. doctor arrives, along with the person seeing him at 8:00 a.m. He announces, "I don't see patients on Tuesdays before 8:00 a.m.," (like I was supposed to know that?) beckoned forward the 8:00 a.m. patient (rather than the 7:00 a.m. patient or me, who had been waiting longer) and disappeared.
The office manager appeared and fell all over herself to apologize. "It was clearly an error made with front desk scheduling and I am so, so sorry."
My jaw, I'll admit, was still hanging a bit. "Wow. You mean he isn't even going to be seeing us today? Even though we were here first, even though your office confirmed it? We have to come back another day?"
"Yes, I'm sorry." She set up another early morning appointment for me three weeks from now. It turns out I have enough medication to get me through till then ("but call me back if you don't," the office manager said, still groveling, "and I'll take care of it,") but still.
"Please confirm with the doctor," I said with a touch of coldness, "that he'll be there at that time.
"Yes, I'll be sure to go over his schedule with him."
Is it unreasonable for the 7:00 a.m. appointment and me to expect that he would see us first? I guess if we were seen today, his other patients throughout the day would have to wait an extra forty minutes instead of having two of his patients (me and Ms. 7:00 a.m.) wait another three weeks, when we'd been promised an appointment today.
Either way, irritated as I was, I also felt a little sorry for the office manager. What a sucky way to start her day, to have all these patients--and probably the doctor--mad at her before she even arrives at work.
What do you think?
Edited to add: It turns out he had later openings today, and Ms. 7:00 a.m. elected to make an appointment for 11:00 a.m. I declined to come back at 11:20 a.m. because I didn't want to miss yet more work since I've been missing so much work with doctor's appointments for Delia. So they would have worked us in today, but we would have had to come back/miss work. Does this get them off the hook?
Also, Ms. 7:20 a.m. who left was furious, saying she hadn't seen him in four months because they've screwed up her appointment three times.
porphyrin, I'd really like you to weigh in on this situation.
I got there and waited. Gradually, it became clear that the doctor hadn't arrived, and the 7:00 a.m. and 7:20 a.m. appointment were still waiting, too. The 7:20 a.m. lady called the back office, discovered that the doctor thought his appointments didn't start today until 8:00, decided she couldn't wait any longer, and left in a snit.
I called and checked the home voice mail; yes, the doctor's office had called to confirm that the appointment was TODAY at 7:40 A.M. I decided to wait until the doctor showed up.
8:00 a.m. doctor arrives, along with the person seeing him at 8:00 a.m. He announces, "I don't see patients on Tuesdays before 8:00 a.m.," (like I was supposed to know that?) beckoned forward the 8:00 a.m. patient (rather than the 7:00 a.m. patient or me, who had been waiting longer) and disappeared.
The office manager appeared and fell all over herself to apologize. "It was clearly an error made with front desk scheduling and I am so, so sorry."
My jaw, I'll admit, was still hanging a bit. "Wow. You mean he isn't even going to be seeing us today? Even though we were here first, even though your office confirmed it? We have to come back another day?"
"Yes, I'm sorry." She set up another early morning appointment for me three weeks from now. It turns out I have enough medication to get me through till then ("but call me back if you don't," the office manager said, still groveling, "and I'll take care of it,") but still.
"Please confirm with the doctor," I said with a touch of coldness, "that he'll be there at that time.
"Yes, I'll be sure to go over his schedule with him."
Is it unreasonable for the 7:00 a.m. appointment and me to expect that he would see us first? I guess if we were seen today, his other patients throughout the day would have to wait an extra forty minutes instead of having two of his patients (me and Ms. 7:00 a.m.) wait another three weeks, when we'd been promised an appointment today.
Either way, irritated as I was, I also felt a little sorry for the office manager. What a sucky way to start her day, to have all these patients--and probably the doctor--mad at her before she even arrives at work.
What do you think?
Edited to add: It turns out he had later openings today, and Ms. 7:00 a.m. elected to make an appointment for 11:00 a.m. I declined to come back at 11:20 a.m. because I didn't want to miss yet more work since I've been missing so much work with doctor's appointments for Delia. So they would have worked us in today, but we would have had to come back/miss work. Does this get them off the hook?
Also, Ms. 7:20 a.m. who left was furious, saying she hadn't seen him in four months because they've screwed up her appointment three times.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:06 pm (UTC)Mind you my GP is USELESS at getting in on time - let alone RUNNING on time, but his patients are used to it and between us and his secretary there is a system in place to stop the waiting!
I'd be chewing out the office manager BIG time - but then I'm bad like that...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:08 pm (UTC)The doctor's behavior was both unreasonable and unprofessional, and a complaint should be registered.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:18 pm (UTC)Another example of the failings of our healthcare system: because there are too few doctors to treat all of the individuals needing care, General Practitioners and Specialists alike, the physician-attitude of "I'm the important one" is reinforced by every circumstance. Now, the majority of people who go into the healthcare field are compassionate people. For the small percentage that are power-tripping asshats, the nature of the system permits their behavior by not offering any consequences.
Lissa
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 06:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:22 pm (UTC)Suppose that he sees an average of three patients an hour for eight hours. He would be inconveniencing 24 patients during the rest of the day to avoid inconveniencing 2 or 3 who were booked before his office hours.
My guess is that this is not the first time the office staff has screwed up, and he's tired of it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:56 pm (UTC)(I'm in the third year of an undergraduate medical degree, by the way. It seems relevant. ^^)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 03:34 pm (UTC)But, as a patient, I'd be extremely irritated regardless.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:27 pm (UTC)I think Lissa is right and he was punishing his office staff for making scheduling errors. But that's not acceptable treatment of patients. He has a duty of care towards you.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:46 pm (UTC)But if the doctor himself is the jerk, get a new doctor and report him to the board of doctors/medicine. There's no reason for a jerk to act like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 03:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 03:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 02:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 03:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 05:09 pm (UTC)But if I'm wrong, then both of them should apologize. Error or not, there was no call for that sort of rudeness.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 06:57 pm (UTC)I simply didn't jump to the conclusion that this was a new policy, as this happens a lot in MY office (not medical!), and even when I do have a long standing policy, our particular office personnel tends to acknowledge sporadically, and there are times that out and out passive-aggressive dynamics come into play when it comes to my calendar and/or relaying phone messages. It's easy to make a supervisor look like a fool or simply negligent by double-booking, not giving messages, etc. I am not currently in a very happy work environment, so that definitely effected my perspective when reading the post!
Also, I'm a big one for apologies all around, it's not just about blame or responsibility, it's about having some empathy that extends to the person that was inconvenienced. If the doctor had just acknowledged the situation and had some remorse about the patients having to reschedule, it would have gone a long way. Likewise, I think the office manager was right in handling the situation, regardless of where the fault lied, in apologizing and working to accommodate prescription needs and rescheduling.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 03:49 pm (UTC)He doesn't care enough about his patients to be flexible when there is a scheduling SNAFU. If it's happened before, he is either not a good enough communicator to make his scheduling preferences clear to the staff, or he is a bad manager.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 03:57 pm (UTC)Yours sounds horrible. That alone would make me want to change doctors.
Rate MDs
Date: 2008-04-29 04:19 pm (UTC)Re: Rate MDs
Date: 2008-04-29 06:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-29 06:45 pm (UTC)And that's coming from someone who halfway lives at doctor's offices a lot of the time.
Ridiculous.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-30 02:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-30 10:30 pm (UTC)I'm appalled that your doctor behaved so rudely to you. His manner suggests that he doesn't really give a damn about you, or about any of his patients, as an individual, just as work to be done according to his schedule. So I would add an emphatic voice to the chorus suggesting you consider finding a more empathetic, patient-friendly physician. If, by chance, this doctor treats you for anything related to depression, I doubly emphasize the suggestion, and would be doubly appalled at his callous indifference to you and his other patients.