Inconvenient facts
Jul. 28th, 2004 11:48 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In the interest of story research, I went to the Aquatennial Milk Carton Races this past Sunday. I'd always planned to have Solveig be in a boat in the race, and I needed to work out some details. The idea was that because of some mishap, she ends up underwater, where a fish talks to her again.
I got to the race, and boy did I feel stupid when I saw the list of the rules. I'd figured there were lifeboats standing by, of course, and that was fine: I wanted her to get fished out of the water (so to speak) quickly. But of course they're going to make all the contestants wear lifejackets, which means that even if Solveig does end up in the water, she's going to bob right up like a cork, no fish-chats possible.
Of course, I'm the author, and I can decree some way around this. Um . . . she's on a part of the boat that's sticking out, and it breaks off, and the boat's going so fast that it goes over her, so she's under water under the boat for maybe 15 seconds. That's long enough. The trouble is, those boats are hardly speed demons. So I can come up with a work-around, but the problem is, it's going to bug me everytime I read the scene (it's been halfway written for a year now) because I'll know every time I read it of course it couldn't really work like that.
So . . . does this happen to you on stuff you write? You have to have something work a certain way, and you find out that no, technically it can't, so you pull out a lame work-around and hope nobody notices?
This is the sort of the thing, I imagine, which will bug me, the author, much more than any reader of the book. Milk carton boats have broken apart, and some have sunk, after all.
Click here, here, here and here for some pictures of other milk carton boats through the years.
[Note: and to add to my irritation, I still haven't figured out what the damn fish says to her in the first place.]
I got to the race, and boy did I feel stupid when I saw the list of the rules. I'd figured there were lifeboats standing by, of course, and that was fine: I wanted her to get fished out of the water (so to speak) quickly. But of course they're going to make all the contestants wear lifejackets, which means that even if Solveig does end up in the water, she's going to bob right up like a cork, no fish-chats possible.
Of course, I'm the author, and I can decree some way around this. Um . . . she's on a part of the boat that's sticking out, and it breaks off, and the boat's going so fast that it goes over her, so she's under water under the boat for maybe 15 seconds. That's long enough. The trouble is, those boats are hardly speed demons. So I can come up with a work-around, but the problem is, it's going to bug me everytime I read the scene (it's been halfway written for a year now) because I'll know every time I read it of course it couldn't really work like that.
So . . . does this happen to you on stuff you write? You have to have something work a certain way, and you find out that no, technically it can't, so you pull out a lame work-around and hope nobody notices?
This is the sort of the thing, I imagine, which will bug me, the author, much more than any reader of the book. Milk carton boats have broken apart, and some have sunk, after all.
Click here, here, here and here for some pictures of other milk carton boats through the years.
[Note: and to add to my irritation, I still haven't figured out what the damn fish says to her in the first place.]
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 10:12 am (UTC)Do you know what message you want her to come away with, after speaking to the fish? Not the exact words, but the impression and impact it will have on her? Maybe it would work better to go backwards like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 10:13 am (UTC)But, hmm...Maybe the thing capsizes and she's stuck underneath it for a bit? You know how it is, you're suddenly underwater and it's cold and you're short on air and you have no idea which way is up.
I also just wanted to say that Solveig is such a cool name - nice choice. I had a violin teacher named that once...didn't get along with her, but it didn't make her name any less cool. Is it Swedish?
The name Solveig
Date: 2004-07-28 10:25 am (UTC)I chose it because it's Norwegian (it's actually derived from Old Norse) and this is Minnesota after all. But not until now had I actually looked up the meaning of the name.
It means "House-woman," or on another website I checked, "House of Strength."
What a PERFECT name for a woman architect!
Damn, sometimes I'm so inadvertantly brilliant that I scare myself.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 10:13 am (UTC)Alternatively, could it be a practice run prior to the real race?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 12:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 10:23 am (UTC)Also, there's an intensely charming children's book that was my mother's on the tallest shelf in the basement. It's called "The Land of the Lost" and is all about talking fish. Borrow that, if you like. Just let me know you've got it, 'cause it's one of those important family books.
Just call up Erik and Nicole and tell them I sent you.
K.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 10:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 12:48 pm (UTC)K. [life jackets are designed to keep an unconscious person floating with their face out of the water. This does not mean one can't do anything else with them. Also, if you go down to Nokomis, think about water clarity and whether she can see the fish]
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 10:29 am (UTC)Geek answer syndrome...
Date: 2004-07-28 10:32 am (UTC)Not having enough character background to know where/how/who she borrowed/bought a life jacket from, but it'd be easy enough to borrow one that had a safety recall, maybe. The trick is to not use one of the failure-proof foam already inflated ones but use an older manual/automatic inflate one, where the bladder could have a hole, the co2 cartridge is empty, or the valve sticks just long enough...
http://www.boats.com/boat-articles/Safety+Gear-145/Inflatable+PFDs/12490.html
Hrmph. Automatics aren't usually approved. Still, a munally inflated one (borrowed?) meets the approved, and if you're not familiar with how to inflate it has a failure scenario that could work:
http://www.overstock.com/cgi-bin/d2.cgi?PAGE=PROFRAME&PROD_ID=752763
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 10:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 11:00 am (UTC)See "Komarr" and breather masks - same principle.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 11:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 11:39 am (UTC)1. Lifejackets are design to save lives, not prevent ones hair from getting wet. I don't see a problem here.
2. Lifejackets are not perfect. They're put on improperly. They're taken off in the heat of the moment. They have structural problems.
I agree with K. Go get a lifejackt. Thrash about in the water for a while.
This isn't a problem.
B
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 12:17 pm (UTC)The things I do for Art.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 11:39 am (UTC)Life Jacket...
Date: 2004-07-28 11:41 am (UTC)Take K's advice and try a life-jacket. I don't think it's that hard to fall out of one or end up with your head under water.
Re: Life Jacket...
Date: 2004-07-28 11:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 12:27 pm (UTC)pfds
Date: 2004-07-28 02:37 pm (UTC)go have fun in the water :)
e
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 05:59 pm (UTC)(From what I know about water clarity in the lakes here, the point about her *seeing* the fish is probably pretty much right on.)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-28 06:30 pm (UTC)Anything's possible -- just play around within the laws of physics. >:D