Jun. 1st, 2005

pegkerr: (Default)
I'm thinking I might get one. I've been on LJ for four years, with the paid account with full complement of user pics, and I don't see my interest diminishing soon (heck, I've been keeping my paper journal for thirty years!)
pegkerr: (Loving books)
Inkheart by Cornelia Funk. First time read. I saw that [livejournal.com profile] desayunoencama also read it this month and didn't find it as charming as I did. I identified strongly with the story of a parent and child's love being intertwined with their mutual love of books--perhaps that was the difference; I'm a parent who has had the experience of introducing plenty of beloved books to my children? I shuddered in complete sympathy with the horror of what the father's mistake meant: he couldn't read aloud to his beloved daughter. I also felt the full horror of what Capricorn did to Elinor: not a killing, not a maiming, but a hurt that struck absolutely at the core of her heart.

The Thief Lord by Cornelia Funk. First time read. A rather intriguing premise, I thought, which speaks to what many children long for the most: the wish to be seen as competent, in command of their own fate. And I thought that Scipio's story was interesting, the root of his problem of why he kept his background cloaked in mystery. I also thought it was amusingly fresh to have the case being handled by a rather unsuccessful (perhaps incompetent) detective.

The Secret Country by [livejournal.com profile] pameladean. Re-read.

The Hidden Land by [livejournal.com profile] pameladean. Re-read.

The Whim of the Dragon by [livejournal.com profile] pameladean. Re-read. Actually, this was only the second time I've read all three of these books, which seems odd, when I've read others of her books many more times. (esp. Tam Lin and Juniper, Gentian and Rosemary). All the years of going to the Shakespeare reading group helped add to my enjoyment. I was surprised to discover that there were vast sections I didn't remember at all, which is not my usual experience when I re-read books. (OTOH, I have a hazy memory that I might have been pregnant when I read them the first time, which would explain everything; I didn't have a brain for months at the time when I was gestating.) One thing I wondered about a great deal was Patrick's attitude toward magic. He is portrayed as a materialist/skeptic who doesn't believe in magic at all when he lands in the magical world (and very interesting it is to compare him, for example, to Lord Andrew, who doesn't seem to believe in magic, either). Actually, a great deal of effort and time is spent, especially in the first book, in trying to address the question "Is what is happening to us real or not?" I wondered, given his attitude, why Patrick would have been interested in playing the game for so many years in the first place--probably because he thought it was a game, and therefore he could "play at it" without taking it seriously? (And after all, how different is that from the sorts of lines we draw in our own imaginations?) The other children seemed to find coping with Patrick stressful: why did they keep playing with him? Because he was so young when they all started, that he just was accepted as a part of the game, no matter how infuriating he grew up to be?

Am now reading Tolkien's The Monsters and the Critics, so that will start next month's list (thanks for lending it to me, [livejournal.com profile] pameladean!)
pegkerr: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] wicked_wish muses about politics, sex and religion:
Lately I've been contacted by a smattering of liberal internet groups, and I'm flattered to be on the rolls but I'm admittedly skeptical about the goals. The rallying cry is "Impeachment!" of course, and it's not like there's not any evidence or anything; but at the end of the day, I don't see it happening. "But they went after Clinton for perjury, why can't we go after Dubya?" they ask.

I would propose that the reasons are simpler than "The Bush Cartel won't let us touch the mighty mighty Dubya" - and they're less noble than "protecting the integrity of the presidential office." At the end of the day, the difference between impeaching Clinton and impeaching Bush comes down to blow jobs and Jesus.
(Read more)
*Sigh* Among the other reasons I despise Dubya, I hate the way his politics have smeared my religion. And it is my religion, too, dangnabbit.

Profile

pegkerr: (Default)
pegkerr

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678 910
1112131415 1617
1819202122 2324
2526272829 3031

Peg Kerr, Author

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags