*Rips out hair*
Dec. 20th, 2005 09:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, so President Bush used his year-end news conference yesterday to resume his public relations offensive against his critics, saying he wants the Justice Department to find out who committed the "shameful act" of leaking word that he secretly approved a special program to spy on US citizens, and blasting senators who have blocked the renewal of the Patriot Act.
He accuses others of shameful acts.
He has violated the separation of powers, he is in violation of the Constitution. He is spying on Americans. And yet his poll numbers are rebounding. I saw that and I thought I might spontaneously combust out of sheer political outrage. My god, what is it going to take for this country to wake up and realize it has been taken over by a dictator who is trashing our system of government?
Edited to add: This reminds me of an old Doonesbury cartoon. Two Congressmen are sitting listening to Nixon's lawyers during the Watergate hearings.
"'No impeachable offense. No impeachable offense,'" mimics one. "How can St. John keep spouting that gibberish?"
They lapse into a despondent silence.
"If only" muses the other, "he'd knock over a bank or something."
"By George!" exclaims the first, "We'd have him then!"
He accuses others of shameful acts.
He has violated the separation of powers, he is in violation of the Constitution. He is spying on Americans. And yet his poll numbers are rebounding. I saw that and I thought I might spontaneously combust out of sheer political outrage. My god, what is it going to take for this country to wake up and realize it has been taken over by a dictator who is trashing our system of government?
Edited to add: This reminds me of an old Doonesbury cartoon. Two Congressmen are sitting listening to Nixon's lawyers during the Watergate hearings.
"'No impeachable offense. No impeachable offense,'" mimics one. "How can St. John keep spouting that gibberish?"
They lapse into a despondent silence.
"If only" muses the other, "he'd knock over a bank or something."
"By George!" exclaims the first, "We'd have him then!"
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:09 pm (UTC)Armageddon. That seems to be what he's trying to bring about, after all.
I saw a post from someone I otherwise like saying "Well, he's the President, after all, he must know more about these things than we do," and I had to walk away from the computer for a few minutes to regain my composure.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:15 pm (UTC)*sigh* And then they showed Kansas Senator Hutchison basically repeating their words.
What on earth has happened to the US? I moved away to England in August 2000. The US truly seems like a foreign country to me nowadays rather than my native land. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:47 pm (UTC)"'No impeachable offense. No impeachable offense' mimics one. "How can St. John keep spouting that gibberish?"
They lapse into a despondent silence.
"If only" says the other "he'd knock over a bank or something."
"By George!" shouts the first "We'd have him then!"
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:45 pm (UTC)I don't understand it. I can see why his base in a certain strain of fundamentalist Christianity is sticking with him (notice "a certain strain"), but I can't understand why, for example, real conservatives are doing so. (Here, again, I'm talking about ordinary folks; some bigger-name conservatives have spoken and written about Bush's lack of conservative values.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:51 pm (UTC)B
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 05:45 pm (UTC)Personally, I was shocked that Sununu, who represents my state, broke with Bush on the Patriot act. I didn't think he had that much integrity; there must be some reason why this is in his self-interest. I suspect he's had an earful from his constituents.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 06:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 03:51 pm (UTC)Redirect, distract, repeat.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 04:42 pm (UTC)Now, if you remove a few words from that sentence you get:
"execution of Karl Rove"
Hey, even with the cost of energy, I'd agree to spend tax dollars on that! ;)
Zap, Recharge, Repeat :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 10:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-21 12:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 04:36 pm (UTC)I have hope. I think the polls respond most to disasters where people can see suffering they can relate to - wars some, the betrayal of an individual with a name and a face and a history quite a bit, natural disasters much more. I know about the spying and I'm utterly outraged, but I'm not personally scared, hurt, or even enraged. Maybe if there were 'human interest' stories about the people who have been hurt by this new crime, it would affect the polls.
But in the mean time, the law is *slightly* less human-interest oriented than individuals/polls are: whether his polls rise a bit or not, he can and should and I devoutly hope will still be impeached.
If he manages to retain the presidency after being impeached, that's when I'm going to lock myself in a small room and refuse to come out until there's a presidential election I can vote in.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 04:36 pm (UTC)In this particular case, he is using the NSA to spy on communications that cross U.S. borders and (he says) only from people that have been found to have some type of contact with Al Qaida. Sounds almost reasonable except that the tired line of "just trust me" is wearing a bit thin. While the NSA's mission is somewhat changed with this directive, they also are obliged to turn over illegal activity information to the proper authorities.
Even that doesn't persuade some (as it's not just terrorists, but criminals as well). However, we have seen from multiple examples of what this administration can and will do and it goes well beyond simple spying on 'criminals'.
Do you think Dick Cheney really cares about your Civil Liberties? Do you think Rummy cares if we fundamentally change the ideals of America because of the possibility of a terrorist attack? Maybe they shouldn't, but we damn well better.
If the Bushites truly cared about such things they first would do more to strengthen our security (borders, airport, trains, food, medicine, nuclear power plants, etc..) than they have rather than spying on Quakers or discerning what book I checked out at my local library. I forgot...they don't have the money to do that as they've been too busy balancing the budget on students and the poor and making sure that that 1% keeps its tax cut...my bad.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-20 06:08 pm (UTC)But! John Conyerrs (er, Representative Conyers) has introduced a motion to censure Bush and Cheney over all this.
"The Select Committee seeks to subpoena the President and other members of the administration in hopes of ascertaining if impeachable offenses have been committed."
YEE freakin' HAW.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-22 01:42 am (UTC)