pegkerr: (With Sam's permission)
[personal profile] pegkerr
[livejournal.com profile] thomtoffner helpfully provides an explanation of what actually happened with that IMAX Order of the Phoenix poster. Emma Watson was NOT enhanced photographically. Instead, the two different pieces of artwork were taken from two slightly different camera angles; the shot was filmed with two different angles as part of the 3-D process. See his explanation here. I find his reasoning persuasive.

So: no nefarious sexist reasons, folks, just camera/3-D technology. Thanks, [livejournal.com profile] thomtoffner!

I am sure you are all relieved. We now return you to our usual high-minded livejournal programming.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-05 03:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mizzlaurajean.livejournal.com
You know I thought maybe it was at a different angle from looking at her face in the two photos. though honestly enhacing pictures doesn't bother me, I think it's imporatnt for young people to know they do this and this isn't how these poeple always look but beyond that I just don't care.

I heart HP!

Dumbledore's my hero!

And I hope that Snape really isn't evil.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-05 05:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arian1.livejournal.com
*cough*see*cough*

Don't hit me please.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-05 07:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciceronianus.livejournal.com
I'm still confused ... Are those shots of the actors actually taken from the film or are they promotional pictures taken with a camera?

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-05 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pegkerr.livejournal.com
I think what he means is that they took promotion shots using the three-D process, which is actually two cameras. But since they only need 2-D to make the poster, for one of the posters, they chose to use the image from one of the cameras, and for the other, they chose the image from the other.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-05 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thomtoffner.livejournal.com
exactly. I really do suspect that there is in fact a 3-D poster, either in theaters now, or eventually. Hopefully someone will spot one so we can settle this once and for all.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-05 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] papersky.livejournal.com
I honestly read the title and thought this was something to do with the heroine of Jane Austen's The Watsons.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-05 02:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pegkerr.livejournal.com
*cracks up* No, it has to do wth my earlier entry here.

Profile

pegkerr: (Default)
pegkerr

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Peg Kerr, Author

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags